11th page
Progressive Thinkers as of 12/1/2022
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some readers may want to know whether or not I think the number 3 or any number is a "spiritual" or "other-worldly" number. Emphatically, no. At least not in the sense of the nonsense spirituality being espoused by any present day religion or Eastern philosophy. Recurrences of number patterns and other patterns are just "indentations" on our type of physiology in the current environmental contexts. The same goes for those repetitions and repetitious non-repetitions we humans think are taking place with Natural phenomena. Instead of trying to fully understand why, we concoct intellectual and emotional themes (often with institutionalized ceremonialism) to suit our dispositions and come to convince ourselves of some propriety if a certain number or quality of one or more others share our view. Number patterns are a tool for investigation and analysis just are other non-number patterns. The "1- 2- Many" model of investigation, analysis and interpretation is not to be viewed as something sacred, but as an artefact of development that I just happen to be the one (at the present time) who tries to make use of it. Others have their own variation, but typically the variation is meant for a specific application. If by my routine use of it makes me more proficient and you want to label the proficiency a professionalism, so be it. If on the other hand you prefer some disparaging remark, that's ok to me to. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But I don't want to be cast into some sort of priestly class of like-minded oriented individuals. We have too much of that nonsense already in every single profession. One must be observationally practical, particularly when something is labeled an exceptionalism. Playing the Devil's advocate keeps one sober so that they won't fall into the trap of illusion, delusion or even psychosis.
Here's an example of the "1- 2- Many" model created for a specific context exhibiting the two extremes first and then the centrality in the 3rd position:
While some readers may think that all-things "spiritual" represent some ultimate form of consciousness and language, to me this is just gibberish; just like so much of the nonsense heard or read about in Eastern philosophy and Western religions. To me it sounds like the C-rap being expressed by the young of today. And yes, I put a "C" in front of Rap to denote what I think of it and that the "C" was dropped in the characteristic behavior of the young expressing themselves by way of a text-messaging language which uses abbreviations and condensations. I don't care whether they espouse some "three" usage or formula in their verbal antics. Such expressions only detail the presence of an underlying pattern which we do not understand in the larger context of identifying some meaning other than the nonsense which has been adopted (albeit found to be useful for those who use it in their own context). The research I've uncovered suggests their usage of the "three" supports such views as being generated and not the other way around. In other words, uncovering the "three" or some other pattern in multiple subjects doesn't confirm the usage of such for a particular religion or Eastern philosophy. Finding multiple examples of a pattern in Nature only serves to confirm the presence of a "Conservation of Number" as a survival mechanism under incrementally deteriorating conditions.
Religion and Eastern Philosophy ideas are different strategies of rationalization used as a coping mechanism for attempts at surviving under the perceived conditions of a given context. All else is mere embellishment contrived by underlying influences of development which become translated by way of cultural orientations to provide alternative ideas to the same underlying patterns all life forms experience according to their respective physiology and level of anatomical expression. For example, the body plan of insects is described as Head- Thorax- Abdomen, but in humans may be elaborated (by way of a more complex functioning brain) into viewing three types of body shape called the Ectomorph- Mesomorph- Endomorph. And yet, the same basic "3" pattern is being applied by humans as part of their rationalized ideological trends utilizing a "Conservation of Number" survival technique. And even if someone comes along and wants to throw a wrench into such an idea by adopting a larger number, they are thus using the often-used three-patterned scheme of one- two- Many... though their particular terminology may be multiplicity, plurality, Infinity, Universe, Numerous, pile, etc..., or some specific number that to them represents a larger number than that typically used, such as trillions, zillions, or otherwise made-up (conjectured) sum like the word "Gazillion"... unless of course they go to some reference source and get the word which references the largest number to be found in its listing.
Let us look at some different "body plans" exhibiting a characteristic "3" pattern, though in several cases the label of "body plan" is not used. For example, the "body plan" for many a person's name is to have a 1st name, middle name, last name, but some Chinese and perhaps other cultures will place their last name first and their 1st name last. (The last, or family name is thought to be more important than a person's given name.) In a U.S. military context, the naming convention (cognitive "body" plan) is to say one's Name, Rank, Serial number. In academic degrees it is Bachelor's, Master's, PhD. In some contexts a person may be asked for their Name, Address, Phone number.
There is no salvation for humanity on Earth, and this includes any idea about living a life which prepares them for some presumed desirable after-life. The only way for humanity to preserve its species for further development is to collectively direct all resources towards severing the umbilical cord with "Mother" Earth by getting off the planet, out of the solar system, and away from the Milky Way galaxy. All the goals of all religions, philosophies, businesses, sciences and governments have no value for the future of humanity if they are being used as rationalizations for keeping humanity tied to the Earth, tied to the solar system and tied to the Milky way galaxy. Far too many of our ideas exhibit the patterns being influenced by the environment and as such, are inevitably directed towards creating some model of rationalization so as to support the species in the environment... as it slowly deteriorates towards an eventual demise, and no amount of environmental conservation can prevent this... it can only slow down the pace which will eventually be offset by an increasing population where losses will exceed any and all gains that are suffered by way of the inebriation caused by rationalization being chosen as a place of refuge because humanity refuses to leave the Earth in any concerted way. Everyone must pay for the departure from Earth and no one must be allowed to hoard or exploit. A collective exodus from the Planet must begin within 333 years or the fate of humanity as it is known will be sealed. (The formal time period in question is January 3rd, 2323 at 3:33 AM.... a 3 years reservation will be accepted so that the final date is 2326 at 3:33 AM.) If humanity is not removed from the solar system in 666 years, the fate of the species will be sealed. (The formal time period in question is January 6th, 2623 at 3:36 AM... a 3 years reservation will be accepted so that the final date is 2626 at 3:36 AM.) If the species has not removed itself from the galaxy in 999 years, the future of the species' reality will be sealed. (The formal time period in question is January 9th, 2923 at 3:39 AM.... a 3 years reservation will be accepted so that the final date is 2929 at 3:39 AM.) The reservation periods will be granted only if the final preparations can be reached in what may be described as an 11th hour point of accomplishment. Otherwise, the formal time will remain as described.
In the contemplation of such an exodus, by whom and how many, one might want to venture forth the ideology of a structured existence during the interim... an interim which is not to be controlled to the extend of binding people to a false belief that the goal had not been reached and therefore the known existence is forced upon all to persist in, or those in the controlling positions will be at a loss of their position due to a greatly diminished following. Here is an example that may or may not be tendered, since there are those who are no doubt better suited for such contemplations. However, one should not be surprised that a mass departure is not concocted by one or more groups instigated by having perpetrated the threat of an unstoppable Nuclear bomb usage, chemical spill, biological warfare, Natural disaster(s), or any combination thereof; backed by business, politics and religion.
Upon having left and living periodic measures of a subsistence life aboard ships in outer space, none of the old Western religions or Eastern philosophies or attendant ceremonies are to be re-newed. Neither are any of the present day alternative, esoteric ideologies such as Wicca, Neo-Paganism, occult beliefs witch-craft, black-arts or intended usage of the old Magical practices, their rituals, etc... Since the nature of Nature will be substantially different, the mind of humanity may want to attempt some substitution such as foraging the development of a technology-based worshiping scheme, if not by word of mouth than by way of ceremonialized routines. This too should not be permitted, though assigned work details is a must for maintaining order. Staying together until the edge of the Galaxy is breached will serve the family of humanity well. Afterwards, the different nations, the different groups, are free to develop their own communities, and all will have the freedom to choose and change their mind as they are so predisposed to do so.
While research into the "threes" phenomena has provided a list of different examples from a variety of sources, it also shows an absence from some places and the presence of another pattern. I can not emphasize enough when I say that when we take stock of the number patterns being generated, we find that only a handful are being used in a repetitive sense for multiple subjects. While one can find larger numbers being used in certain perspectives, they are limited to those certain perspectives. If we simply want to refrain from looking at multiple subjects and concentrate in one direction, then of course we will only see that which we preferentially want to. Like those who want to disparage a use of a given number, be it threes, fours, fives, sixes, sevens, or otherwise. We can indeed make a singular case for the repetition of a given pattern if we are preferentially looking for such a pattern to the exclusion of others. And the same is of course for those who want to focus on exceptions as an argument against another's preferential exception. But if we include all the numbers for all subjects, we do indeed find a recurrence of some number (or geometric, etc.) patterns more than others. I call this phenomena a "Language of Consciousness", even if a given pattern is used in an unconscious manner. Some small numerical patterns (such as fractions) can be used quite frequently in some subject area, but are absence from multiple others. The same situation occurs for much larger numbers such as dealing with astronomical or geological events, though other subjects might be included— such as the decay rates of radioactive particles and the quantity of cell divisions that may occur. But such repetitions don't occur with human thinking. Whereas we can think about them, they do not occur with regular thinking, unless one's brain is isolated in a configuration that is not common. For example, an astronomical event taking place every many thousands of years is not a quantity one encounters when engaged in more common stands of thought in different subjects. If larger or smaller (fractional) numbers were the common orientation, the idea of consciousness types would be viewed in the hundreds or thousands such as 300 or 3,000 or divided into thirds. As such, our human conceptualization of consciousness routinely exhibits a small number of divisions.
Nature appears to be engaged in a "Conservation of Number" such that we encounter am octet (8) rule in chemistry (with three exceptions), but not some 80th, 800th or 8000th rule. Similarly, we find another low number in Nature's interaction of atomic particles not only fractions involving thirds, but quantities of threes, though fractions can be viewed from a perspective of the "2" positions such as 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, etc... Also, we find a small number being used in a basic constituent of Life called DNA, with a triplet code, though some readers may reference the presence of a "2" in the presence of two (double-helix) strands, or cite 4 amino acids, but fail to take into consideration the presence of these patterns (2 strands- 3 code- 4 amino acids) as an ensemble-of-three in a 2-3-4 model.
Using a tool of "threes" is just one way of looking at multiple aspects of Nature. Biology is another tool. So is Religion, business, politics, Sociology, Western/Eastern Philosophy, Mathematics, Yin/Yang ideology, Medicine, Sports, Anthropology, Architecture, Music, Art, Acting, etc... However, most of them are typically focused on a single orientation of Nature such as the Nature of humans in a given activity. Whereas biology has comparative anatomy, and other perspectives may dabble in some type of comparison with or more subjects, they generally do it in a specific way for a given purpose. They may even, on occasion... engage in the use of one perspective as a means of proposing it is wrong in some capacity, such as Biology with its notion of Evolution, when viewed by those in Religion attempting to support their view by advancing the notion of an "intelligent design", but refuse to accept that Evolution could be part of the so-called Intelligent design.
Nature uses a variety of patterns... or at least humans think that what they are perceiving in repetition are to be classified as patterns. If we get others to believe in this same way, just like a few people called Greeks wearing bed sheets agreeing to converse about ideas that they on occasion would disagree with just so they could have a conversation about something, then we can call ourselves a community, if not a society and then civilization and then a Nation that develops a tax system based on a shared belief out of which somebody comes up with the notion of having an Army so as to impose one's beliefs on others... as a means of proving to oneself that they are right in their guesswork which may have intentionally created sciences and mathematics and religions to support earlier beliefs that no one is left alive who can remember what they were... just like religions forgetting their pagan roots or philosophy forgetting it developed as a means by which men could have an excuse to get away from doing chores or that mathematics came from numerology or Astronomy from Astrology, or Chemistry from alchemy, or Nature worship was an elaboration of an obsession with the magical-like qualities of a primitive mind looking at sex, birthing, and development, or Psychiatry and Surgery from trephination (putting holes in peoples heads), etc..
Some philosophies, some religions, some mathematics, some professions, some general knowledge, some abilities, some esoterically specific knowledge, some medicine, etc., works better than others in a given situation... a given environment. Each of them has a tether line which can keep a person from venturing too far afield of a given inquiry. There are some property lines that some people will not permit themselves to cross in their given research, though others are scrambling for some model outside their main field of interest which may provide the path they need to advance their field, or some aspect therein... so long as their search efforts are accepted by colleagues who use the same type of research methodology.
Some people do not like to think of a pattern unless it is confined to their primary interest, which typically does not concentrate on a single pattern, much less a number pattern... unless of course it can be used to gain them some financial, career, property, or manipulative-over-others advantage. Whereas many people understand someone collecting stamps, baseball cards or caps, glass figurines, comic books, music albums, cook books, etc., they have difficulty understanding why a person would collect ideas using a particular number pattern, and then from the accumulation of such ideas, come up with something no one has thought of. My gosh, what a strange person Charles Darwin must have been! In many cases, the collection of similar ideas goes publicly undetected but is used by someone to generate what might appear to be "spontaneous" insights. Whereas some people do keep journals, others keep two or three: One in their head, one that they write in, and one that is shared... usually in a piece-meal fashion with those whom might provide some feedback, whether they realize they are doing so or not. However, it is difficult for someone to get constructive feedback if they are at the top of their game... whatever game they are involved in.
Previously I introduced the reader to the concept of brain development in relation to the migration of the human species out of Africa, with a primary or at least major thrust towards the East involving Asia as well as Australia. In a way we could call this a developmental brain migration though some may prefer brain development as a series of overlapping and inter-connecting structures without using the term "migration", but the word works for me so I will continue using it. Curiously though, while a person may readily accept the notion of successive over-lappings of the brain's development, the idea does not automatically crop up as that which we can apply to the development of consciousness, either for the individual person or the species. Yet, we should consider it... and by the way, I view all that is being discussed as a language of cognition related to the language of conscious. Whereas these preliminary discussions may not seem intelligible to someone who may have chanced upon this page, as they move along through the Narrative series the ideas being presented should become clearer However, it must be understood that I am interested in research, and not so much as culminating in an idea to use as a mechanism by which some financial gain or social position is acquired.
Since the Human species is defined as a life form exhibiting a bilateral structure, it would seem to be the logical assessment to think in terms of language has having a counterpart, though some readers may be reluctant to say that Consciousness is a type of mirror image like that we see when looking at the right and left sides of the body. Indeed, should we consider in doing so, what then do we claim between the two a similarity unless they are counterparts to one another with separate but analogous histories. Then again, how closely should be assign the similarities or discrepancies? For example, do we say that while language is... and therefore has a speech capability, does consciously also have one but it is a speechless type such as we might assign the idea of a symbolic language to? If Language and Consciousness are to be equated in terms of being the other's symmetrical counterpart, is it identical in a fundament sense, but that beyond this each has been shaped differently like the Pentadactyl limb of different life forms? Could one have been developed from a basic floor plan but occurred when the human species was of one type and consciousness... using the same floor plan occurring in a different era of hominid development, acquire other external features? And yet can a single entity such as language or consciousness have their own symmetry, the basic value of which would be tripod- (three part)- like structure, because a two-legged model would not be balanced and would need a type of inner ear canal system featuring three (3 semi-circular canals) used for equilibrium? In addition, let us muse upon the possibility that:
- Language came before Consciousness?
- Consciousness came before Language?
- Both arose simultaneously but had a different developmental path away from some basic floor plan?
Then again, are they even on the same blueprint? In any event, within the confines of our speculation, were do we say that they appeared during development? Were they fated to emerge by genetics? By a particular genetic trait that, when subjected to a particular environmental circumstance, they emerged as a modifiable entity? We don't know, or maybe we do but just don't realize we do. And if we can describe three types of consciousness, are there also three types of language?
One of the methods of attempting to understand human physiology is by making a comparison not only with other vertebrates, but other life forms as well, including plants. More basic than this, since we are looking for fundamental structures which may related to the development of language and consciousness, is the Language used by Nature. One is the Prokaryote line which features the Bacteria, and the other is the Eukaryote line which features the animals... of which humanity is aligned with. However, there is a third entity called the Viruses, which are not considered to be life forms, but nonetheless use DNA. Along with the viruses are plasmids: "—Viruses and Plasmids— are essentially strands of nucleic acid with a protein coat that depend entirely on the host cell for their continual existence." ("life." Encyclopædia Britannica.) Hence, let us itemize the three:
- Viruses and Plamids- "small replicons"
- Prokaryotes- All bacteria are prokaryotic, even though many, probably most, are multicelled in nature. Nuclei, chromosomes, mitochondria,
chloroplasts, ER, and nuclear membranes are all absent in prokaryotes. Prokaryotic cells, which include all the cyanobacteria (formerly called blue-green
algae), are bacteria in every way.
- The only other single-celled organisms that exist are fungi (one-celled fungi are called yeasts). All nucleated organisms (cells with nuclei and chromosomes in their cells) that are not animals, fungi, or plants are Protista. This huge group includes the unicellular or few-celled protists and their multicellular descendants.
- Scientifically speaking, no such thing as a one-celled animal exists. All animals and plants are by definition multicellular, since they all develop from multicellular embryos. Accordingly, all "protozoans" are now classified as single-celled Protista, not animals. Nor are there any one-celled plants. Organisms formerly called one-celled plants are algae and, as such, are now classified with Protista as well.
- Eukaryotes - All animals and plants develop from embryos that by definition combine two complementary sets of chromosomes (i.e., they are diploids at some stage in their development). They are all multicellular eukaryotes. But though there are no one-celled plants or animals, there are indeed myriad many-celled protists. Multicellularity evolved not only in the ancestors to the plants and the animals but also in the bacteria, the protists, and the fungi. All eukaryotic cells undergo some form of mitosis, a sequence of cell division events that occurs after chromosomal DNA protein replication.
In the above definitions taken from ("life." Encyclop—dia Britannica, 2013.), we can see the simple enumerations of 1, 2 and many. (1 and Many/multi-cellular) as well as the term "diploid", or two sets of complementary chromosomes. Hence, we also see the reference to symmetry.
As I begin exploring the 2s and 3s of developmental life (along with other quantitative expressions), I want to exhibit a rather curious phenomena regarding the quantity of layers to cells in plants and animals. Whereas it was previously recognized that there was 3 layers such as in animals formally referred to as a Trilaminar structure, this has been set aside by those who want to highlight a "2-structure" and formally refer to is as a Bi-lipid matrix. However, this is a curious think when we compare the idea to the layers of a plant cell, which are said to exhibit three. Either Nature is counting backwards with respect to developmental complexity, or we are using the wrong idea about identifying structures as we view life forms up the scale of complexity.
Now let me display an old image that I colored years ago concerning a dispute among to Roman dicers, indicating one thinks that the result is a two and the other thinks it is a three:
I want to bring up the "2 versus 3" idea because it may well likely come up when we discuss the quantity of languages and consciousness on basic levels of construction.
Attempting to give a history of humanity's developing consciousness should be understood in the context that I think human consciousness is still developing and is not fully developed as some might want to think an adult... that is... every adult acquires; however sober one may think present day institutionalized ideas are in their forms and functions. If we say that human consciousness arose before language, did it also develop a system of speaking to itself in a symbolic language that we might describe as a rudimentary form of thinking to oneself, from which eventually arose the 3 notions of "Me, Myself and I"? Thus, was there a language established, even if it was a simple one with a small alphabet, that we might describe as an infant having attached to its babbling of consonants and vowels... or did human consciousness use something other... or just one of these (such as only consonants or only vowels... or...)? Whereas we don't know, but speculating about such permits us to create alternatives we might want to use as a starting point to see where and how far we can get in terms of a sequential logic of historical progression to fit what we think we know. Somewhere along human development language was established, but the event of the occurrence may not have been recorded because everyone who experienced a "language emergence" may have been so awestruck as to show it off as a newly acquired skill but there were no historians of any type available, or were there? How would someone describe the emergent property of language if they had no language themselves, or that there was no vocabulary to describe such, because there was no label for it either? One might even speculate that language may have begun with females since so many of "them" ("they" did it, those kind) appear better adept at using it then many males.
If we use the route of some subject like biology, will it lead us to the origin of language? Or how about physiology and the development of the vocal track? Is language due to some injury or accident of birth that caused such a person to be viewed not as an oddity, but as something unique and worth caring for because the child made pleasing sounds? Did the first language sound like someone with laryngitis? Or if when language first emerged, the means of making sounds was already in full force, but the first person making a sound which would later be labeled as language, did become recorded but was lost or is expressed in a manner undecipherable by current models of anthropology, archeology, or history? Was it at first viewed as a means to help humanity achieve great things but turned out just like Sociology has... not to be a Social "Science" by which all of society might prosper, but a social philosophy like so many other porch-swing, street-corner, and stick-whittling contemplators of life's issues? (Need I mention "Political Science"?)
And what of this thing I am calling "language of consciousness"? Did it too have a fledgling beginning and arose not by some internally designed impulse but by accident or injury or some happenstance circumstances of environmental pressures occurring at a given time and place once, twice, three times? Does Nature experiment with its own experimentations and the recurring "threes" such as the triplet code in genetics is a mere toss of some unrecognized dice or spin of a roulette wheel or was it by way of a "chanced fate"?
For example, Did some previous "extra-terrestrian" delivery person... (yes "terrestrian" and not "terrestrial"... one does not say "pedestrial", they say "pedestrian")... did they stop by Earth to have a snack and look over their list of deliveries and mistakenly left behind a package out of which, because of its (bacteriophage-like pop-goes-the-weasel) jack-in-the-box design and ingredients, life as we know it and its subsequent developments are merely following the "plan" of some alien's conveyor belt-created fast food product produced by a system:
- Where one set of hands selects 3 ingredients (meat, cheese, bread),
- that they set on a conveyor belt to be heated for a 3- billions-years-minute
- before being gathered by a second set of hands that adds 3 more ingredients (lettuce, tomato, onion)
- that was then sent along the conveyor belt to be picked up by a third set of hands which placed another set of 3 ingredients (ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise)
- that was then wrapped three times
- and set under three heat lamps to keep warm
- for some three based-interval of time deadline
- to a final 3-step packaging system by being placed in a package with napkins, sales receipt and French fries
- that was stamped with the 3 letters "RNA" (Return Not Authorized) label;
- which was another way of saying "purchase at your own risk";
- because the package was to be delivered to Outer Limits of the delivery service area where the 'Cave at Emptor' (Caveat Emptor) existed,
- denoting the old adage of "Buyer Beware";
- but instead ended up on Earth and created an RNA world making use of a triple code?
All of biological development is a language to me. Some relate to it in terms of the language of Biochemistry and others by way of genetics, and still others through some application of comparative anatomy, comparative physiology or some eventual application of psychology. Because development is important to language development and usage, it is of need to have some working knowledge of it, even though my ideas are not particularly conventional when I run the standard ideas through a "threes" washboard using a bar of lye soap, brush, and swatter-stick before running them through a 3-roller ringer and then start to pin them up on 3 clothes lines with 3 clothes pins in full view of neighbors using modern washing conveniences. What else is there to say for a person who is 3.5 - 4 billion years old... biologically speaking... but then again, so are you.
The development of language no doubt went through a series of steps that we may at sometime uncover the sequence thereof, more fully than we know now. My thinking is that biology provides us a working model of the language development exercise and that we can apply this to a developing cognition and consciousness. We just need to learn how to decipher the language. However, I am troubled by the fact that I think we are confronted by an expression that some researchers find comfort in because they like uniformity which provides some measure of recurring certainty. This expression is the triplet code of DNA. To me it gives me the feeling I am looking at a recurring babbled sequence (called an "utterance" in the lingo of infant researchers). What's wrong with that? you ask. It is a sequence which has taken on the role of a stuck phonograph needle. If the triplet code is not subject to evolving like other biological functions, then something (dare I say "someone?") is suppressing its vocal development beyond the ability to provide any other expression except that which appears to be a parroting effect. Whatever caused the development of DNA to reach and stop at a "3" code (or 3 -to- 1 depending on your vantage point), may still be in existence but it does not affect everything, just those and that which are susceptibly impressionable to its "vocal range" which some might say is the total expression, except we do find evidence of single stranded RNA "expressions"... even though RNA is subjected to the same "3" code usage requirement as well.
Whatever created the sequence of events from which directed life along a course from which a 1-stranded RNA world arose prior to a 2-stranded DNA world, both with a triplet code; might well have exhibited a quality of speech that was silent in terms of what we call verbal expressions, but exceptional loud in a visual way, which is where photo-chemistry and early life forms such as algae arose, thought other life forms are said to have arisen earlier at a distance from the assumed weak solar irradiation which existed long ago. Anyway, before I find myself too deep into biology, let me suggest that the only visible "voice" of the environment with a three-patterned tune is that of the Sun. Its three phases (or as I have been known to describe them as three "moments"), need to be looked at from the perspective that early cellular processes were quite fragile and impressionable, as are the vulnerabilities of a primitive people coming into contact with an over-bearing later culture. But let's take a stab at trying to grasp what the early Environmental concert was like.
Early cellular processes were probably quite intoxicated by how fast the Earth was spinning billions of years ago as they stepped into the Early Environmental disco dance. In such a place there was a 3-patterned strobe-light effect created by the accelerated Earth's rotation subjected to a naked solar irradiation in a reduced oxygen atmosphere of partying. The place was so chaotic that a group of them now called organelles banded together and decided to create a circular-like boundary around them much like a wagon train of musk oxen do for protection against a perceived external threat. The presence of the threat was sustained so long that the band of organelles decided to make their association permanent and from them eventually came early life forms. But the point of this short story is to make reference to the loud voice of the three-patterned Sun speaking to early biological constituents with a microphone tune to their particular wave-length of perception. Not only was the 3-patterned voice standardized as a call to lunch for plant life which learned how to use it to produce chlorophyll, but it is incrementally changing its effect as the Moon moves away and the Earth slows down. Its own behavior is said to incorporate the possibility of enlarging to the point of one day consuming the innermost three planets. And while humans take this for granted because they think all of this well occur over hundreds of millions of years, this is not to say that humans can live well beyond a 24 hour day since the species came unto its own when the rate of rotation was somewhere in the 22 to 23 hour range, and thus may mean humans are rotation rate specific.
Another comment of this environmental speech pattern is that as the Sun enlarges, all the "3s" that have been influenced by it will start to fuse. We can already see this in multiple ideas such as the view that the Christian Trinity is said to be 3 persons in 1 godhead. This not only is a 3 -to-1 ration but also and expression of fusion, though some may want to interpret this as a conservation, abbreviation, condensation, coalescence, or whatever word works best for them in describing a compaction.
Date of (series) Origination: Saturday, 14th March 2020... 6:11 AM
Date of Initial Posting (this page): 3rd Jan 2023... 6:15 AM, AST (Arizona Standard Time); Marana, AZ.