page 1d
Progressive Thinkers as of 5/8/2020
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: for some readers, it is best to describe this cognitive model using the phrase A Standard Cognitive Model instead of The Standard Cognitive model since different readers may utilize a cognitive structuring formula which supplies them with a supportive cognitive rationale that suggests to them some other option. For example, they may prefer to see the basic cognitive formula in terms of a syllogism, which appropriates many guises and labeling's, but that in so very many cases the assumed tripartite structure is little more than an embellished dichotomy and not an actual 3-in-1 or 3-to-1 or 3-from-1, or 3-as-1, etc., portrayal. In this regard we can thus view multiple other examples of declarable basic/standard cognitive structures/formulas; but in collating all such supposed "standards", we find ourselves in a quandary of limitation, just as is represented in:
- A recurring triplet code in DNA (that does not appear to be evolving like other biological constructs).
- A so-called fundamental three-part macro-structure of the atom involving Protons- Neutrons- Electrons which gives the impression of a stabilized recurrence.
- A three-element composition making up over 99 percent of organic molecules: carbon- hydrogen- oxygen; not to mention the recurring currency of using solids- liquids- gases as a cognitive divisory tactic.
The idea of a "standard cognitive model" should not necessarily be interpreted to mean that it has always existed in the full formula that is being inscribed here. Just as we see in the development of humanity's sense of number along a 1- 2 - many scheme, the "standard" formula may mean a "less than full compliment" of the possible. In this sense we recognize that humanity just didn't "all of a sudden" jump into the usage of number words or a full compliment of numbers as we now recognize them. No doubt, we can consider, there were starts, stops and perhaps even some reversals of number-adopted learning due to war, disease, famine, religious persecution etc... Hence, the standard cognitive profile, despite human anatomy exhibiting one, may have been at a "one", or "one-two" sequence of development while others were already venturing into some language equivalent (three-patterned) one- two- many usage, with the word "many" being substituted with a word such as much, plenty, heap, or whatever a given people used to describe their notion of infinity or the Universe of stars.
However, nor should the reader jump to the conclusion that a linear form of enumeration best represents a given person's or people's cognitive preference of usage. In other words, while one person is quite advanced in the usage of enumeration, another person can be just as advanced or beyond by using a geometrically definable cognitive formula that they have standardized, whether or not they are consciously aware they have done so, or can readily make the illustrative distinction between their cognitive usage standard and another's. They may simply realize they think differently but have not been able to nor even considered trying to describe the underlying formulas being used. To this end, let me offer another profile of expression which appears to be a standard not only in human thinking, but multiple other activities found in other life forms. This (let us say) "standard" cognitive formula is being expressed geometrically as a linear- circular- triangular configuration, though different labels are being inter-changeably used, making correlations difficult for some observers. For example:
- Instead of "linear", the word "flat" may be used... or even the word "point"... as if one is looking at the end of a line like peering through a straw or at the tip of a pen/pencil/needle.
- Instead of "circular", the word "spherical" may be used... or even whole, mass, heap, rounded, globular, etc...
- Instead of "triangular" the word "triaxial" may be used... or even vee-shaped, X-shaped, W-shaped (as seen in combustion engines where a v-shaped configuration is used in alternate ways).
This next image gives an enumerated model related to different geometries, even though no actual number symbols are being used to describe linear, circular and triangular configurations:
Structural Communication
By visualizing the "wave and particle" theory of atomic nuclei, (it is conjectured that particles exhibit both a wave and particle form), we can see this in the foregoing "linear" example. The line is both a wave and a particle, if we look at a line with a large enough circumference to observe. The problem is, the idea of a "round" particle may well fit into the notion of a spherical form as seen in the previous triple-formula expression (linear- circular- triangular), but this then leads us to the consideration of whether the linear model of the wave is actually circular. The wave could be of a different geometric form, thus giving us a triangular expression... if... the line is a triangular shape but we are unable to see this mathematically, because our present mathematics is a primitive model being used to conceptualize reality. In essence, we can not see the actual end of the wave to determine its geometric form... whether it is circular "and"/or triangular (or other geometric form... even one described as having no apparent symmetry); because the present state of mathematics is too primitive for us to grasp the line and tip it on its edge to determine whether or not it is circular (a "roundish" particle) or otherwise. Because our present mathematics conveys a certain illustration, we thus fashion experiments to be in accord with. Hence, the double slit experiment is a rationale akin to the old Cucking stool (Dunking chair) philosophy once use to test the guilt and innocence of someone accused of witchcraft. People actually thought such reasoning was logical. Such is the same for the double-slit experiment. It meshes well with the mathematics. Yet, no one questions whether the mathematics is a primitive tool. It is this very question I am presently working on to address in a paper entitled "Infinitesimal versus Accordian Mathematics". I have discovered a path by which a New Mathematics can be developed. No doubt I will be treated like Fritz Zwicky (whose strange name didn't help his position any); who in 1933 proposed an idea involving mass and gravity in the clustering of stars and gas (resulting in the idea we know as "dark matter"). He was viewed as an eccentric and his ideas preposterous. Need I mention others who proposed ideas that were initially disregarded, laughed at, joked about, and even ridiculed... only to later find that such ideas did in fact have merit? Such as Germ theory, Antiseptic theory, Heliocentric theory, radio transmission (involving Sir Jagadish Chandra Bose), television (sending pictures over the air was thought a crazy idea), air flight, space flight, going to the moon, etc... Or how about breaking the sound barrier, a triple somersault, and so many other records thought to be unbreakable were eventually tied or subdued? While it may be understood how someone inside a profession can be ignored, disparaged for their views and even have their ideas stolen, it may not be so easy to comprehend the stumbling blocks and thievery one encounters when they are not a member... particularly when members of a profession sometimes work together to ostracize an outsider even further to the extent their positions add weight to claims it was one or more of their own who came up with an idea being declared by an unknown. (3-19-2021)
One might also venture to include the 3 standards of government activity culled from previous models of criminal activity that the government has taken over in order to not be deprived of the lion's share of the once defined "ill-gotten" gains... that is... ill-gotten in the sense that the government did not previously have a means of enforcing the collections of different enterprising individuals to supply the government with a portion commensurate with its desire to be the chief and principle enforcer and distributor of the money generating apparatus. In order to take over the activities developed by criminals, the government used its own model of force and self-endowed legislative empowerment to enforce public contributions and compliance, though the greatest dividend goes to the government and the people have little say so in how their collective 'monies' are to be proportionally distributed to provide the best equality.
The following three examples are used in various guises by different governments throughout the world and constitute a recurrence of a standardized cognitive model exhibiting a pattern-of-three representing three types of main organizations (Business, Government, Religion) involved in confidence scams:
- The old pyramid schemes have now become legalized and variously labeled as a Social Security (though religions and businesses routinely present them in moral or fiscal credibility terms.
- The old number(s) racket schema has now become legalized and variously labeled as a Lottery (whose supposed greater benefit is to education and other useful social institutions or institutional behavior such as road, bridge, etc., construction).
- The old protectionist scams have now become legalized and labeled as Insurance policies that the public is forced to buy into for one reason or another, to provide the illusion of logic and the ruse of fairness.
From a Sociological perspective, the identification of what has been called the three traditional class divisions (Georges Dumezil's Trifunctional Hypothesis notwithstanding); the three can be categorized in the following manner, despite the many adherents to devising a social class scheme from which more or less class divisions are seen due to one or another representative criteria frequently based on a financial definition:
- Upper class: Owners. They do not manage nor engage in labor. (Yes, it is understood that some owners do manage and engage in labor.)
- Middle class: Managers. They do not own nor engage in labor. (Yes, it is understood that some managers are owners who may engage in labor.)
- Lower class: Laborers. The do not own nor manage. (Yes, it is understood that some laborers are managers as well as full or part owners.)
With respect to the "1 - 2 - Many" profile viewed as a three-patterned ensemble, we find it likewise expressed as a basic formula for sexual orientation:
- ONE...'Mono-sexual': Heterosexuality (Either male-only or female-only partners which can apply to Homosexuals and Lesbians as well).
- TWO... Bi-sexual: Either male and/or female partners.
- MANY... Pan-sexual: Men, Women including animals and inanimate objects or idealizations. (Those with an orientation towards pedophilia, children can be added to their list of "love" objects.)
Let us further this momentary exploration into the 1-2-many profile by a short examination of the prevailing Covid-19 response, with respect to vaccinations. I am not attempting to display a calloused perception of the rather trying and sometimes dire circumstances being experienced, but rather an alternative appraisal which is taking place by different orientations who see circumstances through different lenses of appreciation... even if they do not publicly voice such an opinion. It is no different than the economic possibilities that are explored by many people involved in the stock market when a military situation takes place. Their view is that there is money to be made in any circumstance, including poverty, imprisonment, persecution, imperialism, slavery, etc... As such, under the current social focus on vaccinations let us remark that (generally speaking) the usage of one vaccination has been the standard for many infections (pneumonia, measles, chickenpox, etc...), though on occasion two and three vaccinations have been used for different medical conditions. The usage of a single non-required vaccine provides a source of income for several different players in the development, transport/delivery and administration. In addition, as an aside note, a one-shot three chemical (3 in 1) example is the usage of three drugs for a single lethal injection. Its mention is for those who are cognizant of the 3-to-1 ratio phenomena.
By making a vaccination a legal or life and death requirement, the income has a regulated level of maintaining some semblance of stability. The usage of two vaccinations increases the monetary gains substantially, as well as the positioning and power plays of multiple actors behind the recurring reproduction thereof. Ideally, for those who stand to gain with one or more of the three "P's" (Pecuniary- Position- Power), making a vaccine a requirement, and ideally a routine; the development of vaccinations requiring three separate inoculations will be exceptionally profitable if all people in all populations are put into an enculturated mentality that to not have a vaccination is tantamount to being cast out of a village, in which one must wait for a savior to come and retrieve them, just as a supposed Jesus did to Lazarus who had been cast out and was found in a cave (analogously, one might think of an ancient type of out-of-doors "closet")... thus in "coming out" they were both born anew: Lazarus as an accepted member of the society at large and Jesus as being "special"; no simple mortal man. While we already have occasions for the existence of two and three vaccinations given for particular medical issues, they are not as lucrative as might be if large swaths of the human population on the planet were "socially encouraged" to have them, similar to the socially scrutinized philosophical "encouragement" a person is subjected to in terms of providing tithing to a religion.
In terms of a one-two-many profile, it appears we are headed towards a one-two-three scenario followed by a one-two-many vaccination profile. In other words, the "one-two-many" cognitive sequence of old, from whence came the many excursions of different mathematics exercises which exceeded the "many" label and defined elongated and substantively demonstrable forays of mathematical prowess exceeding the early "one-two-many" cognitive grouping limitation of numerousity and their substitute symbology; is being reincarnated by a profile of economic positivity of thought... and let the public be damned if it doesn't like the New World Order as it is being architectured.
Whether you think the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic is due to an accident of Nature (involving humans as part of the equation), or you are one who subscribes to the reality of our times in which it is not far-fetched nor a conspiratorial theory to consider its occurrence was due to a deliberate orientation involving the desire to "field test" a rather mild biological weapon to "see what happens" similar to the thinking which occurred during the era of the atomic bomb construction and its subsequent usage on innocent Japanese civilians under the rationalized guise that it would save American lives and shorten the war; the fact remains that the pandemic event is being studied by those who want to secure for themselves the best accumulation of the three P's, in as much as they are enabled to do so and whether or not a repeat of the pandemic can be willfully played out and the necessary scapegoats can be named so as to divert attention from the real instigators. Biological weapons platforms, partitioners, and performance measuring are a reality... a reality that needs to be field-tested to gauge public reactions, government responses, U.N. and WHO allocations, journalistic digressions and obsessions, stock market fluctuations, shortages, excesses, institution role playing, public cowardice/courage, mob mentality reactions, security force impulses and improvisation, etc...
Here's an example of those who will do anything to make a profit off of human suffering... even if they have to play a hand in the instigation there of, or perpetuation thereof, or express a calloused indifference to human privations and desperations by their actions/inactions... and let the public be damned if it doesn't like it... which is the chorus which the U.S. senate echoed by exonerating Trump form his obvious guilt, and leaving the little guy and gal to take the rap for his instigations... while those with money and political connections more often than not make out like the robber barons they are:
As his fellow Texans suffered and even died due to the state's power outages, Jerry Jones' natural gas company was gloating about "hitting the jackpot" thanks to skyrocketing gas prices. Billionaires profiting off of human suffering is a feature, not a bug, of our rigged system. — Robert Reich (@RBReich) February 20, 2021
Sports World Reacts To The Jerry Jones Business News by Andrew Holleran, 2/21/20
U.S. Adult Immunization Schedule (2014).
In thinking about a standard cognitive model, one must be flexible in their thinking to allow for the presence of a basic pattern, but not be so dogmatic about a singular pattern that they are obstinate about changing their ideas to fit the research they uncover. For example, a distinct "one-two-many" profile may not be present in all instances, but when it does, a rigidity of thinking will not permit one to use a generality as a specificity. While many of use may use one or more spice dispensers for food such as pepper, salt, onion, garlic, etc., many of us overlook the practice of combining the different dispensers into an amalgamated system of reference. In the following instance, I denote three types of expressions:
- Singular: Sprinkle, (though your personal experience may be a pouring or spooning option).
- Double: Spoon, and Pour.
- Triple: Sprinkle, Spoon, pour Spout/Spot.
We humans appear to overlook patterns right under our noses. Because patterns which can be combined are often loosely approximated into singular instances, the overall pattern is not considered. A similar instance is when we look at the amino acids of DNA and RNA separately. Unless one puts them side by side are they better enabled to pay witness to the presence of three amino acids the same (adenine- cytosine- guanine) and one that is different: (Thymine/Uracil). Hence, the pattern is a three-to-one ratio.
With respect to the 3-to-1 ratio (and variations thereof such as a 9 to 3, 18 to 6, 2 to 6, 4 to 12, etc., such that a 3 multiple is noted), I came across a reference to this cognitive profile being used by an author in a book entitled Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology, ISBN 978-0-300-15845-8). On page 13 of the introduction:
...We are interested in asking, What are the different natures of challenges to iconic Thought? Can they be categorized? Beyond this, are there different "colors" or "hues" of iconoclasm, reflective of different styles of thought of the scientists behind them? Can we, in short, create a kind of taxonomy of iconoclasm that takes into account both the dynamic and the challenge and the underlying cognitive or psychological characteristics of the challenger? We believe this is possible with the nineteen test cases at hand.
Challenges to iconic thought in the life sciences in the twentieth century were of three general kinds: methodological, conceptual and experiments. A fourth category, which deserves separate mention though it often fits into any one of the first three, is the iconoclasm that stems from the transgressing of disciplinary boundaries. The first three categories, as we shall see, map onto the further categorization of (1) process, (2) theory, and (3) discovery.
In the above reference, the authors have used a pattern-of-three profile to reference a recurring cognitive structure but may well be oblivious to its presence; not only in their usage of it but in the multiple other subjects areas I have been trying to highlight by way of different investigative excursions which bring multiple examples to the forefront. No less, while the authors or others reading this might argue that there are other pattern examples, they do not continue this argumentative foray into elucidating the presence of a limitation in the quantity and quality (so-called "colors" and "hues" of patterns (otherwise sometimes described as a prism, menagerie, spectrum, etc..). Like the periodic table, the quantity and quality of letters and numbers, the triplet code in genetics, sports records, etc., the recurrence of cognitive limits prevail upon us to recognize the existence of an imposition caused by the incremental deterioration of the planet, solar system, galaxy and quite possibly the larger Universe. This limitation, this conservation has an effect on biology and its "spectrum" of behaviors called species, mutation, genesis/development, etc., to the extent that the ideas being developed are in accord with the incremental deterioration as an adaptive survival mechanism that shifts its deliberations with respect to available resources and the overall stresses being encountered. Hence, our ideas are rationalizations which we humans egotistically define and label as rationales and ludicrously provide awards for developing some exacting proscription as to a supposed relevance that some may venture to record as a Natural or Supernatural law.
Another example of a recurring three-patterned cognitive structure can be seen in the image describing three concerns or considerations that are said to be fine. The three expressions (1) It's fine. (2) I'm fine. (3) Everything's fine... clearly represents a type of syllogism that one might label as a Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion. However, though the lineup of the expressions is an effort to excuse a person from presenting an egotistical or self-centered image of themselves by placing a reference to themselves in a secondary position, there nonetheless is an unmistakable one- two- many allocation which can be made:
|
With respect to using the analogy between physical musculature and 'political muscle', it may be of value for some readers to take a look at the quantity and functionality of the three muscle types. My intent is not to be definitive, but provide examples which can be appropriated for an enhanced appreciation of sociological forces at play; in the sense that social behavior is executed like a social "body" with its dimensionality similar to that of an articulating musculature. In other words, if society and humanity the whole is more than just a metaphor when described as a "body", then the social "body" may have a similarity of functionality and vulnerability to injury and disease as we see in human and other animal (if not insect and other life form) structures. Not only the strengths, but weaknesses such as old age... thus accounting for the decline of a Nation because it is a body that wears out and dies. No less, its ability to grow and gain strength in development is limited by several factors including the "genetics" of a nation and its resources. While a nation may have multiple resources, it may not have the physical, mental and emotional prowess to make full use of those resources... including its human resource.
support@assignmenthelp.net: Types of Muscles
Some of the major skeletal muscles along with their functions are described below:
- Biceps: Helps in bending of arm at the elbow point.
- Triceps: Helps in strengthening of arm at the elbows.
- Quadriceps: Helps in strengthening of leg.
- Abdominals: Allows truck flexion allowing forward bending.
- Deltoid: Allows sideways raising of arms.
- Gastrocnemius: Allows standing on tip toes.
- Gluteals: Helps in sideways bending of leg.
- Hamstrings: Allows bending of leg at the knee.
- Latissimus dorsi: Helps to pull back the arm and allows it to draw behind the back.
- Pectorals: Helps in raising arms at the shoulder allowing it to draw across the chest.
- Trapezius: Helps in movement of head backward and sideward. Also allows rotation of the shoulder.
The above profile being correlated with sociologically-based class divisions (upper- middle- lower) needs to be further associated with the relevant profiles of the muscles articulated by anatomists. In general, what we see is that the "upper class" (upper leg and arm bones) are associated with the larger and slower muscles (typically seen in the delays of government and corporate activity), though there are fewer of them, which metaphorically corresponds to the "1%" political idea related to those who are said to be in charge of the dominant governing and economic stratifications of our lives. The middle arm and leg bones have increasingly more but a relatively smaller "muscle" assortment, though they have a faster, more responsive ability. When we get to the hand and foot sections, the muscles are functionally inter-linked with the "middle class", with increasing numbers but a small muscle mass. They can execute activity quite fast as seen in the example of some typists.
Upper arm muscles:
Upper leg muscles:
Upper leg (back) muscles
Note: we can correlate the presence of biceps (2), triceps (3), quadriceps (4) with other triple formatted 2-3-4 groupings: Devil's Advocate page 14 |
|
Anterior muscles of the forearm: In general, muscles in the anterior compartment of the forearm perform flexion at the wrist and fingers, and pronation. They are split into three categories:
|
|
Muscles of the hand: The muscles of the hand are innervated by the radial, median, and ulnar nerves. (Muscles of the hand).
|
The "Standard Cognitive Model" (SCM) can be viewed as a type of Rosetta Stone, Behistun Inscription, and Galle inscription, all 3 of which use three different languages (or at least writing systems as in the case of the Rosetta Stone) to describe a singular context of different vantage points amalgamated into a consolidated representation, like the 3 (more or less) multi-language brochures, pamphlets, instruction sheets, scripts, safety warnings, warranties, etc., accompanying many products today. Incidentally, while it comes to mind, the SCM can be referenced as an ensemble of three languages that create an image which is connected to the idea of a Marketplace where the Grand Unified Theory and Theory of Everything is being discussed, although typically being conversed about in the language of Physics attenuated with the accents of Mathematics. Nonetheless, all of them are metaphors, just like a pattern-of-three idea is a type of language with its own vernacular which has divorced itself from being in a subservient, servile position to Numerology, Mysticism, and Esoteric religious rationalizations.
Date of (series) Origination: Saturday, 14th March 2020... 6:11 AM
Date of (this page's) Initial Posting: Monday, 24h January 2022... 11:07 AM