Threesology Research Journal: The Standard Cognitive Model page 1
The Standard Cognitive Model
page 1




Flag Counter
Progressive Thinkers as of 5/8/2020

FWT Homepage Translator
page 1 page 1b page 2 page 3 page 4 page 5
page 6 page 7 page 8 page 9 page 10

The Standard Cognitive Model

Pentadactyl limb comparisons

Let's explore the attempt to define the parameters of a proposed Standard Cognitive Model with respect to a pattern-of-three Linear, Circular, Triangular conformation; viewing it as one of several approximations devised by the human brain. However, it is to be noted that when I say "standard", I am not also claiming some easily referenced identical form. Creativity, serendipity and originality can come into play just as does mediocrity. And though I say "standard Cognitive Model", it might appear to some readers that the last word (Model) should be pluralized to read "Models"; since the standard appears to be made up of multiple ensembles which we can collate together by looking upon human perception and mental activity as one might view and use an artist's color palette, fisherman's tackle box of lures, or even the famous "box of stuff" set aside at the back of a closet, top of a shelf, placed in a shed, the garage, attic, basement... or set nearby such as a kitchen "junk drawer".

This being said, we need to be somewhat flexible in our thinking since "different similar" (or is that "similarly different"?) ideas cropping up under different circumstances (such as attitudes and preferences for traditional designations)... can be labeled and dressed differently. An expressed idea can sometimes take on an embellished abstraction, "stick man" or seemingly non-sensical doodling configuration... as well as various interminglings of language and ideas from different subjects combined together, used as substitutions, whittled on, etc... And yet, for those wondering, the usage of mathematics as an attempted standard model of thinking is problematic, because mathematics is itself a recurring pattern that is not being viewed as a variable, along with the recurring emphasis to use linear and static equations to represent dynamic and non-linear processes. The basic patterns of mathematics are being excluded from being recognized as variables in equations. It requires a different type of Calculus to do this.

A standard cognitive model apparently contains ensembles of three in which three forms can interact, inter-mingle, overlap, inter-play, and produce other types of conjugations that may be alternatively termed as a 3 in 1 ratio, instead of as a 3 "to" 1, 3 "from" 1, 3 "and" 1, 3 "also" 1, etc..., such that reversals of this may be linguistically portrayed as well as derivations. Fore example, 3 minus 1 3 times1, 3 divided by 1, 1-cubed, etc... An example of how a given pattern such as the idea of "three being represented by one" can crop up in multiple scenarios in different cultures in different time periods in different subjects and be portrayed in a modern setting, is found in the physics idea of The Grand Unified Theory (GUT); where the three forces (electro-magnetism, strong, weak) are considered as possibly being one force. Hence, this 3 being 1 can be viewed as a type of ratio, with alternative words and symbols placed between the two values, as one might place the word "unity" between the values of Yin and Yang.

It is not difficult to see that the Grand Unified theory is a 3 to 1 ratio which can be detected as a basic cognitive pattern being used in other subjects, but that those using such a pattern in their preferred subject and context, might well view the pattern with great distinction and not as a recurring theme of human mental activity. As it stands, the pattern can be viewed as a fixed (but flexible/adaptable) organizational theme which becomes used in different contexts and thus may be labeled differently, as well as exhibit other illustrative portraits. For example, instead of "one" the word singularity might be used. And instead of "three" the word many, plenty, heap, few, much might be used. Clearly, the GUT idea in physics is a 3 in 1 idea and dawns the dress, mannerisms and language consistent with the subject in which the basic pattern is cropping up.

Again, to reemphasize the previous point, let us note that the "Three", from some perspectives of looking at the history of counting, can be viewed as the word "Many", such as in the (three-part) primitive counting scheme of "One- Two- Many". Hence, the word "third" is this linguistic phrase is a substitution for the third item. Whereas some readers might want to argue that the "Many" in the foregoing sequence refers to 3 or more, the fact that the phrase is a three-patterned expression itself, can be viewed as a correlation to the idea of a set-of-three, ... such that the U.S. motto E pluribus unum (Latin for "out of many, one"), can be referenced as a symbolic model of the 3 in 1 idea... yet there are several others: Three to One ratios page A.

Without suitable references from other cultures such as the Asian and African which provide "three-to-one" references, regardless of guises, it is of value to tentatively describe the expression as being related to Indo-European peoples, and thus suggests a long-term linguistic transference through time which has established the illustration as a cognitive theme. The Grand Unified Theory is thus a type of cognitive construction being processed which has a history in Indo-European cultures (that other cultures may have borrowed... unless we find evidence that the opposite is true). For example the idea of the Christian Trinity is such that it is sometimes explained as three persons in one godhead. Prior to this idea was the view... one might assume, that the Sun was made up of three "moments" or phrases (Dawn- Noon- Dusk). Gregor Mendel established the idea of a 3 to 1 ratio in biology.

Vareiations which link similarities claimed as important distinctions

To me, the "3 in 1" (or 1 from 3, etc...), is so similar in number variables to the expressions "3 to 1", 3 and 1, etc., that I am inclined to view them in the same context of cognitive usage. As the human brain allows for a wider berth of accommodation for particular cognitive themes as a recurring pattern of familiarity as one might use a particular phrase, piece of clothing, mannerism, etc., as an identification. While distinctions may be made on separate applications to satisfy those who are obsessed with a cognitive theme being expressed in a particular way, I think the two (and other variations) are close enough that the human brain categorizes all of them with a "look alike/sound alike" quality, though some readers swear that "tomato and tomahto" are differences which constitute a dissimilarity of great importance. Nonetheless, the phrase 3 in 1... to me, can also be viewed as 3 and, from, out of, into, etc., 1. Hence, when I see us using a comma to separate three items, even though in language we call it a series of three and in mathematics we call it a set of three, the same basic idea is being referenced. Likewise when I see that both DNA and RNA have the same three amino acids, and then are distinguished by as separate one [respectively: Thymine/Uracil], the usage of some to call the association a group of four instead of a three-to-one ratio does not change the fact that the human mind has configured perceptions in a similar way. The Grand Unified Theory in physics may be an idea which references a linguistic tradition of a similar cognitive behavior that we might want to reference as a (part of a) Standard Cognitive model.


3 in 1 Grand Unified Theory

Three in One Grand Unified Theory as a recurring cognitive theme

Despite those readers who are inclined to describe four forces and four directions and four amino acids instead of a "three" theme, let me again point out that there needs to be a "3-to-1" label of referencing placed into our research and descriptive formulas. Three items can be distinguished from a single one, if not by place of position, activity, labeling or use of some conventionalized demarcation such as a comma, then by a deliberate act of seeking to review our ideas in an alternative manner. Hence, when viewing the 3/1 (or: 3\1 or: 3_1 or 3:1, etc...) we have such examples as:

Here are some various 3 to 1 examples meant to be shown as a recurring cognitive pattern showing up in different guises. Recurring cognitive patterns illustrate recurring environmental and social pressures being created by and subjected to the incremental deteriorations of the Sun (it's burning out), Earth (it's rotation is slowing), and the Moon (it is receding); to which humans produce rationalizations (such as business, politics, religion... superstitions, traditions, holidays... etc.) as a make-shift survival mechanism and an attempted coping mechanism.


  • Three: Electro-magnetism, Strong, weak forces... One: differentiated Gravity force (Why Gravity Is Not Like the Other Forces)
  • Three: North, South, East... (demarcated by a comma) One: West
  • Three: (the same amino acids) Adenosine, Cytosine, Guanine... One: (differentiated single amino acids) (DNA = Thymine), (RNA = Uracil)
  • Three: Stop codon amino acids... One: Start codon amino acid
  • Three: (A colloquialism) "We teach the ABC's"... One: All the rest of the alphabet is not typically used to describe teaching the alphabet.
  • Three: ones, tens, hundreds... One: (demarcated by a comma) before the thousands is placed... and then the sequence repeats liks a babbled utterance.
  • Three: "For he's a jolly good fellow" (repeated 3 times)... One: (followed by the phrase:) "For which nobody can deny"
  • Three: Dawn- Noon- Dusk... One: Sun (Three "moments" of phases in one Sun.)
  • Three: Solids, Liquids, Gases... One: Plasma
  • Three: (spatial dimensions) Depth, Width, Height or Width, Breadth, Height; (point, line, plane) [3 dichotomies: up and down, left and right, back and forth]... One: Time (dimension)
  • Three: Length, Width, Height... One: Volume
  • Three In One: The gas laws consist of three primary laws: Charles' Law, Boyle's Law and Avogadro's Law (all of which will later combine into the General Gas Equation and Ideal Gas Law). The three fundamental gas laws discover the relationship of pressure, temperature, volume and amount of gas. ( Gas Laws). Gay-Lussac's Law refers to an ideal Gas. Other laws deal with Real or actual laws. Hence, a dichotomy is differentiated.
  • Three: Father- Son- Holy Spirit... One: God (Three persons in one god-head)
  • Three: Three main engines... One: Space Shuttle (Three rocket engines in one space shuttle.)
  • Childhood game of four-square features four possible players with one acting as the initial server of the ball.

Childhood game of four square

  • Three: Premium, Mid-grade, Regular (gasoline)... One: Diesel fuel oil
  • Playing three to one: British slang referencing the penis and two testicles set against the one vagina.
  • Three: A protein's sequence of amino acids (or primary structure), determines Secondary and Tertiary structures. All proteins have primary, secondary and tertiary structure... One: Some proteins are made up of more than one amino acid chain, giving them a quaternary structure. (Protein Structure Tutorials)
  • Three: Buy three tires... One: Get one free (or for a dollar)

    Three to one tire sales offerring

  • Whalefish Researchers have discovered that a group of deep-sea fishes previously classified into three separate families are actually the larvae, males, and females of a single family -- the whalefishes. (Researchers show that three fish families are actually one)
  • War time perspective: Never light three cigarettes with one match (because a sniper can then locate your position). Phrase Finder: Three on a match
  • Myth: You are never more than three feet from a (at least one) spider. ( Myth: You're always within three feet of a spider)
  • The One infamous electric eel is actually three distinct species. (The Truth About Electric Eels Has Long Been Overlooked)
  • Three: Matthew, Mark, and Luke are called the Synoptic Gospels... One: John is called the idiosyncratic gospel.
  • Three: Superman, Perry White, Jimmy Olsen... One: Lois lane (Superman television series of the 1950s in the U.S.; Three main male characters to one main female charaters.)
  • ETC...

Three:

3 commonly referred to monkeys: See, Hear, Speak no evil

Three commonly known and referred to monkees
https://openclipart.org/detail/283580/4-monkeys-improved
One:

1 commonly unknown Monkey: Do no evil

One uncommonly known monkey


3 to 1 pattern seen in basic tissue types

The puzzle of the human mind is that it is a puzzle for which different people perceived different topics (landscape, seascape, cosmological, biological, etc...) as "The" picture on the front of the puzzle box; which they then use in an attempt to put pieces/fragments together after they have arranged them according to some orientation which may have been developed in isolation or on the academic production line... if not compounded by multiple perspectives from different vantage points using personalized forms of bio-feedback and experimentation in altering one's consciousness by way of enhancing or restricting some physiological sensory channel.


Three types of Universe geometries

Different perspectives of the three Universe geometries

Typically, we come across the idea of string theory coupled to the notion of "branes" derived from the word "membrane" but in physics is used to describe the idea of dimensions having a boundary. And just like biology we find arguments or suppositions which attempt to illustrate conjectures of observations illustrated with the mediums respective of a given subject. In the case of physics, the color palette of choice is mathematics. In warehouse work, the pallet of choice is made of wood, though the spaces in wooden pallets is not routinely viewed in the same sense of offering different selections of mathematical equations or color combination until one attempts to palletize different size boxes on a given pallet. Choosing the right wooden pallet for a given size of container or goods to be shipped is like choosing which color is best for a painting or which equation is best for a particular subject's criteria. All of them present the respective user with "holes", with string-like interconnections, and levels of application which can be labeled as mem-branes, if one's vocabulary and mindset allow for such uses. In the case of a wooden pallet, the "strings" are sometimes made of wood. In the case of an artist's palette, the strings are blotches of mixed paint used for color variation. While "color" is a consideration in particle physics, the "sounds" (vibrations) of particle configurations has not yet reach a common usage of everyday orientation.

While the idea of "branes" is common, the commonality also is to display them in terms of a square or the first selection of the three universe geometries. We do not commonly come across illustrations which use circular or spherical representations for strings and branes, nor the usage of triangles. The following is a thrown-together attempt to provide some semblance of using spheres and triangles for the strings and brane theories, though some readers may prefer to use other standard or non-typical geometrically configured diagrams:


How many ways can we illustrate the three Universe Geometries?

Different perspective of the three geometries of the Universe

LInear, Circular, Triangular configurations of time

Approximating correlative ideas

We seek out patterns. Sometimes it is of need to combine information and ideas from more than one subject area in order to uncover commonalities of occurrence which are concealed due to habitat of occurrence. In this case, "habitat" can refer to culture, language, and subject matter spanning the length of human existence as it has been affected by influences from micro- and macro events such as those occurring on the atomic, genetic, planetary and larger cosmological areas. Whereas we say that humans are affected by events in nature, and some speculate that larger planetary activities play a role in guiding or at least determining aspects of our lives, we can use a broad-minded approach when examining the 3 basic fingerprint patterns labeled Loop, Whorl and Arch. However, there are variations to these three and some anomalous appearances and even cases of Adermatoglyphia, which is a lack of fingerprints. Nonetheless, there is an established three-patterned basic world standard because most people have similar patterns.


3 Basic types of Fingerprints

3 basic fingerprint patterns correleated with the line, circle and triangle.

If we view such patterns as biological representations of larger cosmological possibilities, then we notice that the patterns are embedded by surrounding lines that we may... for instance, label as eddy currents, or visible magnetic fields in a vacuum confronting an object. (Yet if the three fingerprint patterns can viewed in such a manner, can not there also be other 'microscopic' biological references to influential macroscopic influences... even external to Earth's pressures?)

To me, in making connections with the three basic geometric forms labeled as Linear, Circular, Triangular, though you may prefer other labels; it of need to temporarily extract the forms from the surrounding "eddy" currents and allow for the labels to be expressed as objects subjected to external forces which distort the images to portray the type of "field distortions" they exhibit. Granted that this terminology may be crude or insufficient for some readers, it nonetheless provides for some measure of footing upon which to provide some beginning perspective for further examination... whatever language and symbolism one has a preference for.


Fingerprints can come in different forms, but share similarities

Eddy currents of magnetism would be difficult to visibly see with the naked eye if they are dark lines occurring in the darkness of space, be it called dark matter, dark energy, or some other current trend in naming such phenomena... and if no other objects are nearby to provide a hint that they are present.

We must ask ourselves if we have a straight line, is the line singular, double, triple or otherwise? Are we confronted by three different types of string theory or three different types of forces which can affect a single string theory in three different ways? What force(s) is/are necessary to make a relative straight line bend into what can be described as a linear loop, a circular whorl, and a triangular arch? Are we thus confronted by three forces:

  1. That which the line itself exerts.
  2. External to the line.
  3. That which occurs to prevent the line from fully collapsing inward such as a so-called dark energy conducive to such a line?

Is there layering to dark matter/dark energy... hence, making the idea of "Branes" (as in mem-brane) more accommodating?

Do these patterns reflect a single type of manifold space, three different types of manifold space, or three possibilities which can be distorted by what appear sometimes to be mathematical forms of gaming or "fudging" the numbers as occurs with some accountants predisposed to a particular result?

Is/Are the presumed object(s) stationary, with a "current" flowing around it? Are the object(s) moving in a given direction? Are they instead vibrating/Oscillating? Do the patterns reflect open/closed and midway string theory positioning? Are the objects passive, assertive (standing their ground) or out-right aggressive?

Why is human physiology receptive and reactive to certain impressions but not others? Why exhibit an impression of quantum physics but not geophysics? In other words, why do we not see a physical example of the Earth's geomagnetic field as an easily recognizable portrait, as one might see environment affecting tree rings or the long-term moon's growth ring affects in fossil corals and shells and ancient photosynthetic bacteria layers, called stromatolites? The Moon's Influence On Us. Are fingerprints a type of growth ring or some other cosmological representation (not to be defined in some superstitious way)?


Linear, circular, triangular stromatolites



If we add the word "radiological" (associated with atomic) to the lineup of the three (ABC) weapons of mass destruction ensemble, we see another 3-to-one ideological configuration noted in the ideas of:

  • Three dimensions of space and one of time
  • Three stop codons and 1 start codon
  • Mendelian 3-to-1 genetic ratio
  • Three amino acids the same (adenosine-cytosine-guanine) and one is different: thymine/uracil (for DNA and RNA)
  • Three-to-one directions; with the word "and" as a point of demarcation, like the comma in a series of numbers: North, South, East "and" West

Dental formula of different animals showing a similar pattern of number

An example of a physiological dimension of the three-to-one ratio, along with distinctive three-patterned organizations and developmental sequencing can be found in human teeth. While is it claimed there are four types of teeth, the usage of pre-molar followed by molar and then third molars, presents us with a three-to-one in the form of three and then an ensemble of three or two and then the third with a group of three. The quantity of roots expressing 1-2-3 configurations suggests a developmental sequence if we assume that "1" represents a more primitive or early stage of development and the 2-root followed by a 3-root pattern reflecting later arriving developments. And yes, there are anomalies. For instance, you may find yourself with four roots in a given tooth. Some people might have jaws too small for a full 32 teeth compliment. Let us not confuse anomalies with recurring consistencies as an attempted maneuver to throw a wrench into a working idea. A larger excursion into teeth can be found here: Anatomical, Biological and Physiological Threes page 1.

  1. Incisors
  2. Canines
  3. Pre-molars...
  1. Molars

Or.....(1) Incisors (2) Canines/ (3) premolars- molars- 3rd molars


One, two and three roots of human teeth

Let us also make a comparison of different teeth to show what is termed a dental formula. Notice the 0, 1, 2, 3 quantity, though other species such as the pig can display a difference: " For permanent teeth, pigs exhibit a dentition formula of 3/3, 1/1, 4/4, 3/3 or three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars on each side of the top and bottom of the mouth for a total of 44 teeth." (Pig Tooth Enamel Formation).

Other examples of the three-to-one ratio exist in a variety of forms such as: While there are only three weapons of mass destruction symbolically outlined, the usage of four different symbols creates a three-to-one portfolio:

4 Symbols of warfare representing 3 ideas

Are the three Universe geometries projections of our anatomy?

Examples of the linear, circular, triangular congnitive standard

We find an interesting recurrence with the added flavor of another 1-2-3 formula if we look past the typical left/right brain hemisphere listings and involve the presence of enumeration, which leads us to the point of having to add the frequently dismissed lower brain functions as mere contributors to the two hemispheres, like smaller countries playing a kow-towing subservience to dominant Western and Eastern countries much in the role of an indentured-for-life role without either a voice or name for itself, though without which the so-called "higher" brain functionalities (or large economies) would soon find themselves in poor conditions... if able to survive for long without such basic providers of labor and their ability to use basic resources most advantageously.


Left and Right brain hemisphere attributes
Detaling enumeration of brain hemsiphere attributes


Here are some other considerations to the brain attributes enumeration profile:

  1. If we use the left hemisphere attributes to analyze either the right hemisphere or reptilian complex (early vertebrate brain structures such as the brain stem and cerebellum), we find there is an inclination to view activities in a tri-partite organizational format which can include geometric illustrations such as the use of a triangle, which may be inverted or overlapped with other imagery including other triangles to form different configurations... which includes multiples there-of or even fractional counterparts which equal the same, such as describing three equal lines but never using a term such as an equilateral triangle. (Left Hemisphere "analyzing" Right Hemisphere and Reptilian complex:)
    • Holistic or Holistic/partial may acquire the additional term such as "Synergy" and/or "Unity"; yin/yang acquires a term such as unity: (yin-unity-yang)
    • Music dichotomies can develop a Triadic structure or a triadic structure becomes viewed as a dominant theme amongst the presence of multiple dichotomies
    • Art (contrasts) can acquire a 3rd dimension perspective or 3-color (trichromatic) theory
    • Emotion can be assigned words (in a 3-word grouped fashion) such as (Compassion, Patience, and Empathy)
    • Dualities and singularities take on a tripartite theme
  2. If we use the right hemisphere attributes to examine the left hemisphere and reptilian complex, we find a proclivity to arrange items into patterns-of-two which may be alternatively labeled as dichotomies, dualities, bi-lipid, con-, co-, as well ad multiples or fractions there-of to conceal the usage of such a pattern (perhaps under some circumstances) by suggesting something other than the actual functionality of using a pattern-of-two. In other words, instead of describing three components, one will use a word to encapsulate the three into a representative duality. (right hemisphere attributes to examine the left hemisphere and reptilian complex:)
    • Math trichotomies (1 + 2 = 3), (3 - 1 = 2), (3 ÷ 1 = 3), (1 x 2 = 2) may be seen as a dichotomy such as Give & Take
    • 3-part Logic (Major Premise-Minor Premise-Conclusion) may become a Mind/Body or Nature/Nurture, etc., dichotomy (that philosophers argue about for centuries)
    • 3-part Time divisions become related to a dichotomy such as Life & Death
    • Tri-modal Language is perceived as High & Low pitch
    • Triplicities and singularities take on a dualistic theme.
  3. If we use the reptilian complex to generate its hyper-vigilant perceptions of reality, we seen an indulgence in singular themes such as the "ONE" god, or the "ONE" universe, or Nationalism (singular group identity), or Ego-centricity (the "Chosen People"), or the "Number 1" team, or singular best performance, performer, player, entity, etc... We also have themes such as a centralized government, head of state, group leader, GUT (Grand Unified Theory), TOE (Theory of Everything)... to which we might want to humorously include other three-lettered anatomical references with their own variations the reader might indulging create for the letter grouping of: EAR, EYE, RBC (red blood cells), WBC (white blood cells), etc., all of which involve taking a pattern-of-three (or multiple) and reinterpreting or reconfiguring them to illustrate a singularity. In other instances patterns-of-two (or multiples) consistent with the right hemisphere are "translated" into representing some singular perspective.

or those interested in more intensive studies due to laterlization differences during development, here's an example:


The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants
by C Chiron, I Jambaque, R Nabbout, R Lounes, A Syrota, O Dulac


Abstract

The development of functional brain asymmetry during childhood is confirmed by changes in cerebral blood flow measured at rest using dynamic single photon emission computed tomography. Between 1 and 3 years of age, the blood flow shows a right hemispheric predominance, mainly due to the activity in the posterior associative area. Asymmetry shifts to the left after 3 years. The subsequent time course of changes appear to follow the emergence of functions localized initially on the right, but later on the left hemisphere (i.e. visuospatial and later language abilities). These findings support the hypothesis that, in man, the right hemisphere develops its functions earlier than the left.



It is interesting to note how prominent a usage of the 1- 2- and 3- pattern can be used in different cultures, but no one is cataloguing them as a representation of a recurring cognitive theme. Let us take for example the usage of the fingers in some hand gestures, though one might want to cite higher numbers being sometimes displayed in some circumstances. I shall provide two well-known finger-symbol displays (at least to westerners), and then several representations of the "three"-fingered expression that some generalize by calling all such illustrations as a Three-finger salute but in actual practice is not a salute but a sign of solidarity and like-minded recognition. The word "salute" is being used by single-minded journalists who want to frame all perceptions into some personalized rendition of interpretation instead of fully appreciating the usage of a particular symbol in a given context:


Three-fingered protest of Myanmar and Thailand 3-fingered gesture of Serbians
3-fingered salute of scouts the world over Eating with 3  ffingers
Do you focus on two fingers or three fingers? 3-finger sports grips
3-fingered gesture of the Pope 3-patterned hand gesture of Spock
3-finger OK gesture of White Supremacists
3-fingered expression of UAE

The three-finger grip is a common preference among many, though there are other grips available:

  • 3 finger grip (lifting weights or gymnastics)
  • 3-finger golf swing drill
  • Top 3 Grip Positions for Fingerboard Training (For rock climbing) involving three distinctions:
    1. Level of specificity
    2. Robustnus of soft tissue structures
    3. Transfer of strength training into your performance
  • Gripping the bowstring
  • With respect to holding a pen, pencil, or paint brush... either 2, 3, or 4 finger grips can be used. With respect to the three- and four-finger models, they are often labeled as Dynamic or Lateral tripod and similarly as Dynamic or lateral quadrupod. (With respect to paint brushes, there is a "creative license" which is used to hold the brush in any manner a given artist may think to experiment with, including the usage of their mouth, toes, etc... if not by extension involving some attachment.)

Note: for some readers, it is best to describe this cognitive model using the phrase A Standard Cognitive Model instead of The Standard Cognitive model since different readers may utilize a cognitive structuring formula which supplies them with a supportive cognitive rationale that suggests to them some other option. For example, they may prefer to see the basic cognitive formula in terms of a syllogism, which appropriates many guises and labeling's, but that in so very many cases the assumed tripartite structure is little more than an embellished dichotomy and not an actual 3-in-1 or 3-to-1 or 3-from-1, or 3-as-1, etc., portrayal. In this regard we can thus view multiple other examples of declarable basic/standard cognitive structures/formulas; but in collating all such supposed "standards", we find ourselves in a quandary of limitation, just as is represented in:

  • A recurring triplet code in DNA (that does not appear to be evolving like other biological constructs).
  • A so-called fundamental three-part macro-structure of the atom involving Protons- Neutrons- Electrons which gives the impression of a stabilized recurrence.
  • A three-element composition making up over 99 percent of organic molecules: carbon- hydrogen- oxygen; not to mention the recurring currency of using solids- liquids- gases as a cognitive divisory tactic.

The idea of a "standard cognitive model" should not necessarily be interpreted to mean that it has always existed in the full formula that is being inscribed here. Just as we see in the development of humanity's sense of number along a 1- 2 - many scheme, the "standard" formula may mean a "less than full compliment" of the possible. In this sense we recognize that humanity just didn't "all of a sudden" jump into the usage of number words or a full compliment of numbers as we now recognize them. No doubt, we can consider, there were starts, stops and perhaps even some reversals of number-adopted learning due to war, disease, famine, religious persecution etc... Hence, the standard cognitive profile, despite human anatomy exhibiting one, may have been at a "one", or "one-two" sequence of development while others were already venturing into some language equivalent (three-patterned) one- two- many usage, with the word "many" being substituted with a word such as much, plenty, heap, or whatever a given people used to describe their notion of infinity or the Universe of stars.

However, nor should the reader jump to the conclusion that a linear form of enumeration best represents a given person's or people's cognitive preference of usage. In other words, while one person is quite advanced in the usage of enumeration, another person can be just as advanced or beyond by using a geometrically definable cognitive formula that they have standardized, whether or not they are consciously aware they have done so, or can readily make the illustrative distinction between their cognitive usage standard and another's. They may simply realize they think differently but have not been able to nor even considered trying to describe the underlying formulas being used. To this end, let me offer another profile of expression which appears to be a standard not only in human thinking, but multiple other activities found in other life forms. This (let us say) "standard" cognitive formula is being expressed geometrically as a linear- circular- triangular configuration, though different labels are being inter-changeably used, making correlations difficult for some observers. For example:

  1. Instead of "linear", the word "flat" may be used... or even the word "point"... as if one is looking at the end of a line like peering through a straw or at the tip of a pen/pencil/needle.
  2. Instead of "circular", the word "spherical" may be used... or even whole, mass, heap, rounded, globular, etc...
  3. Instead of "triangular" the word "triaxial" may be used... or even vee-shaped, X-shaped, W-shaped (as seen in combustion engines where a v-shaped configuration is used in alternate ways).

Linear, Circular, Triangular models

This next image gives an enumerated model related to different geometries, even though no actual number symbols are being used to describe linear, circular and triangular configurations:


numerical indices in geometry
Structural Communication

By visualizing the "wave and particle" theory of atomic nuclei, (it is conjectured that particles exhibit both a wave and particle form), we can see this in the foregoing "linear" example. The line is both a wave and a particle, if we look at a line with a large enough circumference to observe. The problem is, the idea of a "round" particle may well fit into the notion of a spherical form as seen in the previous triple-formula expression (linear- circular- triangular), but this then leads us to the consideration of whether the linear model of the wave is actually circular. The wave could be of a different geometric form, thus giving us a triangular expression... if... the line is a triangular shape but we are unable to see this mathematically, because our present mathematics is a primitive model being used to conceptualize reality. In essence, we can not see the actual end of the wave to determine its geometric form... whether it is circular "and"/or triangular (or other geometric form... even one described as having no apparent symmetry); because the present state of mathematics is too primitive for us to grasp the line and tip it on its edge to determine whether or not it is circular (a "roundish" particle) or otherwise. Because our present mathematics conveys a certain illustration, we thus fashion experiments to be in accord with. Hence, the double slit experiment is a rationale akin to the old Cucking stool (Dunking chair) philosophy once use to test the guilt and innocence of someone accused of witchcraft. People actually thought such reasoning was logical. Such is the same for the double-slit experiment. It meshes well with the mathematics. Yet, no one questions whether the mathematics is a primitive tool. It is this very question I am presently working on to address in a paper entitled "Infinitesimal versus Accordian Mathematics". I have discovered a path by which a New Mathematics can be developed. No doubt I will be treated like Fritz Zwicky (whose strange name didn't help his position any); who in 1933 proposed an idea involving mass and gravity in the clustering of stars and gas (resulting in the idea we know as "dark matter"). He was viewed as an eccentric and his ideas preposterous. Need I mention others who proposed ideas that were initially disregarded, laughed at, joked about, and even ridiculed... only to later find that such ideas did in fact have merit? Such as Germ theory, Antiseptic theory, Heliocentric theory, radio transmission (involving Sir Jagadish Chandra Bose), television (sending pictures over the air was thought a crazy idea), air flight, space flight, going to the moon, etc... Or how about breaking the sound barrier, a triple somersault, and so many other records thought to be unbreakable were eventually tied or subdued? While it may be understood how someone inside a profession can be ignored, disparaged for their views and even have their ideas stolen, it may not be so easy to comprehend the stumbling blocks and thievery one encounters when they are not a member... particularly when members of a profession sometimes work together to ostracize an outsider even further to the extent their positions add weight to claims it was one or more of their own who came up with an idea being declared by an unknown. (3-19-2021)

One might also venture to include the 3 standards of government activity culled from previous models of criminal activity that the government has taken over in order to not be deprived of the lion's share of the once defined "ill-gotten" gains... that is... ill-gotten in the sense that the government did not previously have a means of enforcing the collections of different enterprising individuals to supply the government with a portion commensurate with its desire to be the chief and principle enforcer and distributor of the money generating apparatus. In order to take over the activities developed by criminals, the government used its own model of force and self-endowed legislative empowerment to enforce public contributions and compliance, though the greatest dividend goes to the government and the people have little say so in how their collective 'monies' are to be proportionally distributed to provide the best equality.

The following three examples are used in various guises by different governments throughout the world and constitute a recurrence of a standardized cognitive model exhibiting a pattern-of-three representing three types of main organizations (Business, Government, Religion) involved in confidence scams:

  1. The old pyramid schemes have now become legalized and variously labeled as a Social Security (though religions and businesses routinely present them in moral or fiscal credibility terms.
  2. The old number(s) racket schema has now become legalized and variously labeled as a Lottery (whose supposed greater benefit is to education and other useful social institutions or institutional behavior such as road, bridge, etc., construction).
  3. The old protectionist scams have now become legalized and labeled as Insurance policies that the public is forced to buy into for one reason or another, to provide the illusion of logic and the ruse of fairness.

From a Sociological perspective, the identification of what has been called the three traditional class divisions (Georges Dumezil's Trifunctional Hypothesis notwithstanding); the three can be categorized in the following manner, despite the many adherents to devising a social class scheme from which more or less class divisions are seen due to one or another representative criteria frequently based on a financial definition:

  1. Upper class: Owners. They do not manage nor engage in labor. (Yes, it is understood that some owners do manage and engage in labor.)
  2. Middle class: Managers. They do not own nor engage in labor. (Yes, it is understood that some managers are owners who may engage in labor.)
  3. Lower class: Laborers. The do not own nor manage. (Yes, it is understood that some laborers are managers as well as full or part owners.)

With respect to the "1 - 2 - Many" profile viewed as a three-patterned ensemble, we find it likewise expressed as a basic formula for sexual orientation:

  1. ONE...'Mono-sexual': Heterosexuality (Either male-only or female-only partners which can apply to Homosexuals and Lesbians as well).
  2. TWO... Bi-sexual: Either male and/or female partners.
  3. MANY... Pan-sexual: Men, Women including animals and inanimate objects or idealizations. (Those with an orientation towards pedophilia, children can be added to their list of "love" objects.)

Let us further this momentary exploration into the 1-2-many profile by a short examination of the prevailing Covid-19 response, with respect to vaccinations. I am not attempting to display a calloused perception of the rather trying and sometimes dire circumstances being experienced, but rather an alternative appraisal which is taking place by different orientations who see circumstances through different lenses of appreciation... even if they do not publicly voice such an opinion. It is no different than the economic possibilities that are explored by many people involved in the stock market when a military situation takes place. Their view is that there is money to be made in any circumstance, including poverty, imprisonment, persecution, imperialism, slavery, etc... As such, under the current social focus on vaccinations let us remark that (generally speaking) the usage of one vaccination has been the standard for many infections (pneumonia, measles, chickenpox, etc...), though on occasion two and three vaccinations have been used for different medical conditions. The usage of a single non-required vaccine provides a source of income for several different players in the development, transport/delivery and administration. In addition, as an aside note, a one-shot three chemical (3 in 1) example is the usage of three drugs for a single lethal injection. Its mention is for those who are cognizant of the 3-to-1 ratio phenomena.

By making a vaccination a legal or life and death requirement, the income has a regulated level of maintaining some semblance of stability. The usage of two vaccinations increases the monetary gains substantially, as well as the positioning and power plays of multiple actors behind the recurring reproduction thereof. Ideally, for those who stand to gain with one or more of the three "P's" (Pecuniary- Position- Power), making a vaccine a requirement, and ideally a routine; the development of vaccinations requiring three separate inoculations will be exceptionally profitable if all people in all populations are put into an enculturated mentality that to not have a vaccination is tantamount to being cast out of a village, in which one must wait for a savior to come and retrieve them, just as a supposed Jesus did to Lazarus who had been cast out and was found in a cave (analogously, one might think of an ancient type of out-of-doors "closet")... thus in "coming out" they were both born anew: Lazarus as an accepted member of the society at large and Jesus as being "special"; no simple mortal man. While we already have occasions for the existence of two and three vaccinations given for particular medical issues, they are not as lucrative as might be if large swaths of the human population on the planet were "socially encouraged" to have them, similar to the socially scrutinized philosophical "encouragement" a person is subjected to in terms of providing tithing to a religion.

In terms of a one-two-many profile, it appears we are headed towards a one-two-three scenario followed by a one-two-many vaccination profile. In other words, the "one-two-many" cognitive sequence of old, from whence came the many excursions of different mathematics exercises which exceeded the "many" label and defined elongated and substantively demonstrable forays of mathematical prowess exceeding the early "one-two-many" cognitive grouping limitation of numerousity and their substitute symbology; is being reincarnated by a profile of economic positivity of thought... and let the public be damned if it doesn't like the New World Order as it is being architectured.

Whether you think the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic is due to an accident of Nature (involving humans as part of the equation), or you are one who subscribes to the reality of our times in which it is not far-fetched nor a conspiratorial theory to consider its occurrence was due to a deliberate orientation involving the desire to "field test" a rather mild biological weapon to "see what happens" similar to the thinking which occurred during the era of the atomic bomb construction and its subsequent usage on innocent Japanese civilians under the rationalized guise that it would save American lives and shorten the war; the fact remains that the pandemic event is being studied by those who want to secure for themselves the best accumulation of the three P's, in as much as they are enabled to do so and whether or not a repeat of the pandemic can be willfully played out and the necessary scapegoats can be named so as to divert attention from the real instigators. Biological weapons platforms, partitioners, and performance measuring are a reality... a reality that needs to be field-tested to gauge public reactions, government responses, U.N. and WHO allocations, journalistic digressions and obsessions, stock market fluctuations, shortages, excesses, institution role playing, public cowardice/courage, mob mentality reactions, security force impulses and improvisation, etc...

Here's an example of those who will do anything to make a profit off of human suffering... even if they have to play a hand in the instigation there of, or perpetuation thereof, or express a calloused indifference to human privations and desperations by their actions/inactions... and let the public be damned if it doesn't like it... which is the chorus which the U.S. senate echoed by exonerating Trump form his obvious guilt, and leaving the little guy and gal to take the rap for his instigations... while those with money and political connections more often than not make out like the robber barons they are:

As his fellow Texans suffered and even died due to the state's power outages, Jerry Jones' natural gas company was gloating about "hitting the jackpot" thanks to skyrocketing gas prices. Billionaires profiting off of human suffering is a feature, not a bug, of our rigged system. — Robert Reich (@RBReich) February 20, 2021
Sports World Reacts To The Jerry Jones Business News by Andrew Holleran, 2/21/20


Vaccination_doses (129K)
U.S. Adult Immunization Schedule (2014).

In thinking about a standard cognitive model, one must be flexible in their thinking to allow for the presence of a basic pattern, but not be so dogmatic about a singular pattern that they are obstinate about changing their ideas to fit the research they uncover. For example, a distinct "one-two-many" profile may not be present in all instances, but when it does, a rigidity of thinking will not permit one to use a generality as a specificity. While many of use may use one or more spice dispensers for food such as pepper, salt, onion, garlic, etc., many of us overlook the practice of combining the different dispensers into an amalgamated system of reference. In the following instance, I denote three types of expressions:

  1. Singular: Sprinkle, (though your personal experience may be a pouring or spooning option).
  2. Double: Spoon, and Pour.
  3. Triple: Sprinkle, Spoon, pour Spout/Spot.

3 spice pouring options

We humans appear to overlook patterns right under our noses. Because patterns which can be combined are often loosely approximated into singular instances, the overall pattern is not considered. A similar instance is when we look at the amino acids of DNA and RNA separately. Unless one puts them side by side are they better enabled to pay witness to the presence of three amino acids the same (adenine- cytosine- guanine) and one that is different: (Thymine/Uracil). Hence, the pattern is a three-to-one ratio.

With respect to the 3-to-1 ratio (and variations thereof such as a 9 to 3, 18 to 6, 2 to 6, 4 to 12, etc., such that a 3 multiple is noted), I came across a reference to this cognitive profile being used by an author in a book entitled Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology, ISBN 978-0-300-15845-8). On page 13 of the introduction:

Book cover for reference

...We are interested in asking, What are the different natures of challenges to iconic Thought? Can they be categorized? Beyond this, are there different "colors" or "hues" of iconoclasm, reflective of different styles of thought of the scientists behind them? Can we, in short, create a kind of taxonomy of iconoclasm that takes into account both the dynamic and the challenge and the underlying cognitive or psychological characteristics of the challenger? We believe this is possible with the nineteen test cases at hand.

Challenges to iconic thought in the life sciences in the twentieth century were of three general kinds: methodological, conceptual and experiments. A fourth category, which deserves separate mention though it often fits into any one of the first three, is the iconoclasm that stems from the transgressing of disciplinary boundaries. The first three categories, as we shall see, map onto the further categorization of (1) process, (2) theory, and (3) discovery.


In the above reference, the authors have used a pattern-of-three profile to reference a recurring cognitive structure but may well be oblivious to its presence; not only in their usage of it but in the multiple other subjects areas I have been trying to highlight by way of different investigative excursions which bring multiple examples to the forefront. No less, while the authors or others reading this might argue that there are other pattern examples, they do not continue this argumentative foray into elucidating the presence of a limitation in the quantity and quality (so-called "colors" and "hues" of patterns (otherwise sometimes described as a prism, menagerie, spectrum, etc..). Like the periodic table, the quantity and quality of letters and numbers, the triplet code in genetics, sports records, etc., the recurrence of cognitive limits prevail upon us to recognize the existence of an imposition caused by the incremental deterioration of the planet, solar system, galaxy and quite possibly the larger Universe. This limitation, this conservation has an effect on biology and its "spectrum" of behaviors called species, mutation, genesis/development, etc., to the extent that the ideas being developed are in accord with the incremental deterioration as an adaptive survival mechanism that shifts its deliberations with respect to available resources and the overall stresses being encountered. Hence, our ideas are rationalizations which we humans egotistically define and label as rationales and ludicrously provide awards for developing some exacting proscription as to a supposed relevance that some may venture to record as a Natural or Supernatural law.

Standard Cognitive Model example

Another example of a recurring three-patterned cognitive structure can be seen in the image describing three concerns or considerations that are said to be fine. The three expressions (1) It's fine. (2) I'm fine. (3) Everything's fine... clearly represents a type of syllogism that one might label as a Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion. However, though the lineup of the expressions is an effort to excuse a person from presenting an egotistical or self-centered image of themselves by placing a reference to themselves in a secondary position, there nonetheless is an unmistakable one- two- many allocation which can be made:

  • It's fine: This actually is a secondary (or number "2") issue though it is placed first in the line-up.
  • I'm fine: This is the primary (or number "1") issue though it is placed second in the line-up.
  • Everything's fine: "Everything" is an expression of multiplicity, or the "Many".

With respect to using the analogy between physical musculature and 'political muscle', it may be of value for some readers to take a look at the quantity and functionality of the three muscle types. My intent is not to be definitive, but provide examples which can be appropriated for an enhanced appreciation of sociological forces at play; in the sense that social behavior is executed like a social "body" with its dimensionality similar to that of an articulating musculature. In other words, if society and humanity the whole is more than just a metaphor when described as a "body", then the social "body" may have a similarity of functionality and vulnerability to injury and disease as we see in human and other animal (if not insect and other life form) structures. Not only the strengths, but weaknesses such as old age... thus accounting for the decline of a Nation because it is a body that wears out and dies. No less, its ability to grow and gain strength in development is limited by several factors including the "genetics" of a nation and its resources. While a nation may have multiple resources, it may not have the physical, mental and emotional prowess to make full use of those resources... including its human resource.


3 muscle types
support@assignmenthelp.net: Types of Muscles

Some of the major skeletal muscles along with their functions are described below:

  • Biceps: Helps in bending of arm at the elbow point.
  • Triceps: Helps in strengthening of arm at the elbows.
  • Quadriceps: Helps in strengthening of leg.
  • Abdominals: Allows truck flexion allowing forward bending.
  • Deltoid: Allows sideways raising of arms.
  • Gastrocnemius: Allows standing on tip toes.
  • Gluteals: Helps in sideways bending of leg.
  • Hamstrings: Allows bending of leg at the knee.
  • Latissimus dorsi: Helps to pull back the arm and allows it to draw behind the back.
  • Pectorals: Helps in raising arms at the shoulder allowing it to draw across the chest.
  • Trapezius: Helps in movement of head backward and sideward. Also allows rotation of the shoulder.

The above profile being correlated with sociologically-based class divisions (upper- middle- lower) needs to be further associated with the relevant profiles of the muscles articulated by anatomists. In general, what we see is that the "upper class" (upper leg and arm bones) are associated with the larger and slower muscles (typically seen in the delays of government and corporate activity), though there are fewer of them, which metaphorically corresponds to the "1%" political idea related to those who are said to be in charge of the dominant governing and economic stratifications of our lives. The middle arm and leg bones have increasingly more but a relatively smaller "muscle" assortment, though they have a faster, more responsive ability. When we get to the hand and foot sections, the muscles are functionally inter-linked with the "middle class", with increasing numbers but a small muscle mass. They can execute activity quite fast as seen in the example of some typists.


2, 3, 4 grouping pattern found in muscles

Upper arm muscles:

  • There are three muscles located in the anterior (front) compartment of the upper arm – biceps brachii, coracobrachialis and brachialis. They are all innervated by the musculocutaneous nerve. A good memory aid for this is BBC biceps, brachialis, coracobrachialis.
  • The posterior (back) compartment of the upper arm contains the triceps brachii muscle, which has three heads. The medial head lies deeper than the other two, which cover it. Arterial supply to the posterior compartment of the upper arm is via the profunda brachii artery. Muscles of the Upper Arm

Upper leg muscles:

  • The muscles of the anterior part of the thigh include the quadriceps group and three others: Pectineus, Sartorius, Iliopsoas (major and minor). The Thigh Muscles

  • The musculature of the thigh can be split into three sections; anterior, medial and posterior. Each compartment has a distinct innervation and function. The muscles in the anterior compartment of the thigh are innervated by the femoral nerve (L2-L4), and as a general rule, act to extend the leg at the knee joint. There are three major muscles in the anterior thigh – the pectineus, sartorius and quadriceps femoris. In addition to these, the end of the iliopsoas muscle passes into the anterior compartment. Muscles in the Anterior Compartment of the Thigh

Upper leg (back) muscles

  • The muscles in the posterior compartment of the thigh are collectively known as the hamstrings. They consist of the biceps femoris, semitendinosus and semimembranosus, which form prominent tendons medially and laterally at the back of the knee. As group, these muscles act to extend at the hip, and flex at the knee. They are innervated by the sciatic nerve (L4-S3). Muscles in the Posterior Compartment of the Thigh

Note: we can correlate the presence of biceps (2), triceps (3), quadriceps (4) with other triple formatted 2-3-4 groupings: Devil's Advocate page 14

Anterior muscles of the forearm: In general, muscles in the anterior compartment of the forearm perform flexion at the wrist and fingers, and pronation. They are split into three categories:

  • Superficial: The flexor carpi ulnaris, palmaris longus (This muscle is absent in about 15% of the population.), flexor carpi radialis and pronator teres. They all originate from a common tendon, which arises from the medial epicondyle of the humerus.
  • Intermediate: The flexor digitorum superficialis is the only muscle of the intermediate compartment. It can sometimes be classed as a superficial muscle, but in most cadavers it lies between the deep and superficial muscle layers. The muscle is a good anatomical landmark in the forearm – the median nerve and ulnar artery pass between its two heads, and then travel posteriorly.
  • Deep: There are three muscles in the deep anterior forearm; flexor digitorum profundus, flexor pollicis longus, and pronator quadratus. Muscles in the Anterior Compartment of the Forearm

Muscles of the hand: The muscles of the hand are innervated by the radial, median, and ulnar nerves. (Muscles of the hand).

  • The extrinsic muscles are located in the anterior and posterior compartments of the forearm. They control crude movements and produce a forceful grip.
  • The intrinsic muscles of the hand are located within the hand itself. They are responsible for the fine motor functions of the hand.
    • The thenar muscles are three short muscles located at the base of the thumb. The muscle bellies produce a bulge, known as the thenar eminence. They are responsible for the fine movements of the thumb.
    • The hypothenar muscles produce the hypothenar eminence a muscular protrusion on the medial side of the palm, at the base of the little finger. These muscles are similar to the thenar muscles in both name and organization.
    • There are four lumbricals in the hand, each associated with a finger. They are very crucial to finger movement, linking the extensor tendons to the flexor tendons.
    • The interossei muscles are located between the metacarpals. They can be divided into two groups: the dorsal and palmar interossei.
    • (A third item:) There are two other muscles (Palmaris Brevis and Adductor Pollicis) in the palm that are not lumbricals or interossei and do not fit in the hypothenar or thenar compartments. Muscles of the hand

The "Standard Cognitive Model" (SCM) can be viewed as a type of Rosetta Stone, Behistun Inscription, and Galle inscription, all 3 of which use three different languages (or at least writing systems as in the case of the Rosetta Stone) to describe a singular context of different vantage points amalgamated into a consolidated representation, like the 3 (more or less) multi-language brochures, pamphlets, instruction sheets, scripts, safety warnings, warranties, etc., accompanying many products today. Incidentally, while it comes to mind, the SCM can be referenced as an ensemble of three languages that create an image which is connected to the idea of a Marketplace where the Grand Unified Theory and Theory of Everything is being discussed, although typically being conversed about in the language of Physics attenuated with the accents of Mathematics. Nonetheless, all of them are metaphors, just like a pattern-of-three idea is a type of language with its own vernacular which has divorced itself from being in a subservient, servile position to Numerology, Mysticism, and Esoteric religious rationalizations.




Date of Origination: Saturday, 14th March 2020... 6:11 AM
Date of Initial Posting: Friday, 8th May 2020... 4:48 PM
Updated Posting: Wednesday, 28th July, 2021... 3:19 AM