(or Triads, Trimurties, Triple Deity, Triunities, Trebles, Triangles, Triskelions, etc...?
Correlations, Coincidences, or Compatible connections of a comparative cognition?
| 1st of 1st | 2nd of 1st | 3rd of 1st |
| 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 | ||
~ The Study of Threes ~
http://threesology.org
Visitors as of September 13th, 2024
The foregoing trinity examples of television news-casters is not typically seen as an example of an underlying cognitive pattern that keeps repeating. To suggest such may well raise one or another objection such that the pattern is not occurring on every station or by every news source, and that single, double and more-than three people is the pattern elsewhere. Such arguments are from those who are not aware that the triad or trinity example is but one of several identifiable patterns, but that when you place all such patterns together as if creating a mathematical set, we find some patterns dominating others... and that this same type of mental behavior is occurring in different subject areas. For example, we might express the parenthetical set as:
— or —
...in a non-word sequential form as:
...or — some other variation of these low number values. Hence, for one example, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity is little more than an elaborate means of using a given pattern. The same goes for the Hindu religion with its Trimurti (Brahma- Vishnu- Siva) and the duality of the Yin/yang philosophy. Underlying all the Jargon and social ceremonialism are some very simply patterns we can find in biology and anatomy as well as laws of Nature (such as the 3 laws of motion and 3 laws of planetary motion and the concept of time with its past-present-future, etc...). It's not that larger numerical values are not available, nor that we humans are incapable of thinking in enlarged formulas, it's just that there appears to be something that is limiting us. It is important to identify what is imposing a limitation on life forms and whether or not this limitation is little more than an "artificial" construct developed by the environment we are on, such as it being the third planet from a source of solar energy and not the first, second, fourth or otherwise. Is this limitation(s) dangerous for humanity in the very distant long-run... but we create religions, mathematics, sciences and politics which will claim otherwise, because denial and self-defeat are more easily adopted and adapted to by large segments of the population?
Some readers may think that the usage of the Greek and Roman columns is a poor choice of an example when it comes to providing evidence for the existence of a viable reference to the usage of a one-two-three or 1- 2- Many or some 1-to-3 (or 3-to-1) or 3 + 2, etc... pattern. Instead, they would prefer that I used some reference of an underlying basic biological reference such that there is the idea of three life domains which has taken the place of the older idea involving five Kingdoms, though some prefer the older five system of classification:
| Here is an example of a "5" → to → "3" direction, which can be correlated to the 5' and 3' reference found in the Chemical structure of DNA and RNA: | |
 Three Kingdoms of Life classification system |
 Five Kingdom Classification system |
DNA is made up of two strands. At one end of each strand there is a phosphate group attached to the carbon atom number 5 of the deoxyribose (this indicates the 5' terminal) and at the other end of each strand is a hydroxyl group attached to the carbon atom number 3 of the deoxyribose (this indicates the 3' terminal). The strands run in opposite directions and so we say that they are anti-parallel. One strand runs in a 5' → 3' direction and the other runs in a 3' → 5' direction. Adjacent nucleotides are attached together via a bond between the phosphate group of one nucleotide and the carbon atom number 3 of the deoxyribose of the other nucleotide. The bases of each strand link together via hydrogen bonds. Adenine and Guanine are purines as they have two rings in their molecular structure. Thymine and Cytosine are pyrimidine's as they only have one ring in their molecular structure. A purine will link with a pyrimidine. Adenine and thymine link together by forming two hydrogen bonds while Guanine and cytosine link together by forming 3 hydrogen bonds. Source: DNA Structure See Also: See Also: Chemical Structure of RNA | |
Yet, while there is a bit of numerical quantification being presented, a better portrayal is the overlapping series of strandedness and complexification found when introducing the sequence of RNA, DNA and Proteins. We can see the more simplified one-pattern expressing a developmental transition to a double-stranded between RNA and DNA... with a solidification of the double-stranded conformation in DNA as opposed to RNA... followed by a simple to increasing levels of complexity in proteins outlined by a primary, secondary, tertiary and then a quaternary structure. This is not to say that neither RNA nor DNA will ever achieve its own 3-to-1 ratio expression as that seen in protein conformations, it's just that at this stage in evolution we can see a one- two- three and 3-to-1 line of progression. Whether or not someone wants to claim that this basic formula is being played out in various cognitive and behavioral realms, will thus be determined whether or not they also believe there is a numerically identifiable means of ascertaining not only evolutionary development of the mind and body, but the limits of possible progression as well as the amount of deterioration taking place as a result of "rationalized adjustments" taking place as the result of attempting to adopt an adaptive physical and mental strategy for maintaining some semblance of equilibrium in an environment that is incrementally deteriorating, and there is no place for humanity to go because its efforts to leave the planet are either short- sighted, piece-meal, non-existent, or otherwise excused as an irrelevance to ideas practicing self-serving motivations within available social spheres.
Increasing levels of (numerically identifiable) overlapping development in basic structures: | |
 |
 |
Like the child's game of Fish where pairs, triples or quadruples of similarity are matched, we can come across numerous types of patterns-of-three depending on whether we used the words three, trio, triad, trinity, triple, triangle, treble, (containing prefixes "tri" or "tre") etc... However, in the game of Fish, the parameters of what can and can't be matched is dictated by the rules of the game as defined by the manufacturer of a given model of the game. It is the same type of imposition I found while engaging in a psychology test exercise in which I was given the instructions that the 30 cards which were in front of me could be placed in any order I wanted. But to the dismay of the female test over-seer who said I had to place the "cards in the right way" (matching cards with characteristics of animals, objects, etc...); after I had simply counted out three stacks of 10 and told her I was done. When I repeated that she said I could place the cards in any order I wanted, she was undeniably angered. Because she wasn't prepared for an unconventional thinker... especially one who stood their ground (with some internalized amusement at the situation), she took the cards and I left. The professor of the class (whom I disliked very much), wanted to test me for imagery, but I decided not to show up for the test... I think (having occurred so many decades ago) because something more important came up. I could sense he was not pleased with me when I showed up in class the next time, because he looked at me when telling the class that if someone signs up for a test session, they need to show up. I also considered the possibility that my absence made me more unpredictable, and thus more of an enigma when compared to the common student. But as I said, I disliked him very much and thought nothing of having missed an appointment with him.
Yet, in getting back to the analogy of the "Go Fish!" game and making comparisons with respect to patterns-of-three, there are those who interpret "fishing" as a serious sport (and not as a leisure activity) just as do some of us who are interested in the Threes Phenomena... even though a few like myself engage in the research activity of threes as both a serious and leisure pastime. And of course, let us not forget to mention those adult fishing aficionados who takes exception with the intended child's definition of "fish", then we can defer to their insistence on some level of sophistication— such as using the "go fish" word of "trolling with the (inter)-net". For the present page I used the word "trio" along with entertainment, or sports, or science... though other words could have.
 |
 |
 |
The observation to point out is that many people are resorting to the usage of a word other-than "Trinity" to represent a pattern-of-three, when all such labels are inter-connected with a brain functioning in a similar way in different places and different times, albeit sometimes upright, sometimes inverted in a mirror-image sense, or alternatively rotated to describe some visualized rotation... mix and match as you will. No doubt, perhaps without consciously realizing it, they are assigning the word "Trinity" to the exclusive domain of representing that which is believed to be "owned" by religion, and do not want their perspective of a given three-item ensemble to be viewed from a religious perspective. The word trinity can be viewed with a large "T" representing a cross in order to also display the origin of the cross symbol as having been derived from the ancient "pagan" custom of wearing a phallic symbol (penis and two testicles) within a Nature worship frame of reference... that had been inverted and labeled as being evil by past church leaders attempting to form a religion as a form of social control during an age when the public was appreciably naive and superstitious; and thus wanted to get the populace to follow them by declaring the inverted cross (as a symbol of the penis and two testicles)... a symbol of the devil or Satan. Likewise, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity is derived from a pagan past in which the Sun with its three "moments" (dawn-noon-dusk) was worshiped as part of a heritage of Nature worship. The language of the Trinitarian doctrine is little more than a reference to the Sun and its three moments as "individuals with individual characteristics" but are one and the same. This describes the Sun and its three moments.
Take a look at a reference to the Trinitarian doctrine and recognize the ancient Sun-as-a-Three-in-one-god reference:
The Christian doctrine of the Trinity
According to this central mystery of most Christian faiths, there is only one God in three Persons: while distinct in their relations with each other ("it is the Father who generates, the Son who is begotten, and the Holy Spirit who proceeds"),[9] they are stated to be one in all else, co-equal, co-eternal and consubstantial, and each is God, whole and entire.[10] Accordingly, the whole work of creation and grace in Christianity is seen as a single operation common to all three divine persons, in which each shows forth what is proper to him in the Trinity, so that all things are "from the Father", "through the Son" and "in the Holy Spirit".[11] C.S. Lewis makes the analogy to a cube and its six square faces: God is like the solid mass of the cube, invisible inside it, while the three Persons are like the squares, which are each equally its visible faces Source: Wikipedia: Trinity |
Let us now take the first paragraph and rewrite is as might a planetary scientist engaging in an exercise of poetry or prose: The Scientific doctrine of Life holds that the Sun is one God, but three co-eternal consubstantial phases or hypostases—the Dawn, the Noon, and the Dusk—as "one Sun in three Divine Phases". The three Phases (moments/events) are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature" (homoousios). In this context, a "nature" is what one moment does, whereas a "phase" is what one is. Sometimes differing views are referred to as non-Scientific, and therefore represented as irrelevant to the arrogance of those involved in a discussion thereof. According to this central mystery of most Planetary Science faiths, there is only one Sun in three Phases: while distinct in their relations with each other ("it is the Dawn who generates, the Noon who is getting hotter and brighter, and the Dusk who proceeds"), they are stated to be one in all else, co-equal, co-eternal and consubstantial, and each is the Sun, whole and entire. And one can further describe the three moments of the Sun, as an object of ancient nature worship sometimes referred to as Pagan worship, in terms of the Hindu Trimurti, since they too represent an image of the Sun's three phases: Dawn = Brahma (creation), Noon = Vishnu (maintenance), Dusk = Siva (destruction). And since the Sun and its three "moments" have had such a large impact on the psychology of millions of people, we need to examine the effect(s) it has had on the biology of humanity and other life forms which exhibit various formulas of trinitarian structure. This is why we can find Threes in human anatomy and Threes as a dominant theme in Nature, not to mention threes in betting, language, mathematics, and various other subjects, even if those involved in such subjects are not themselves aware of their repeated usage and reliance on one or more three-patterned structures... and whether or not they describe their reliance and usage as a type of religion or worship. |
holds that God is
one God, but three coeternal consubstantial persons or hypostases—the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit—as "one God in three
Divine Persons". The three Persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature" (homoousios). In this context, a "nature" is what one is, whereas
a "person" is who one is. Sometimes differing views are referred to as non-Trinitarian. According to this central mystery of most Christian faiths, there
is only one God in three Persons: while distinct in their relations with each other ("it is the Father who generates, the Son who is begotten, and the Holy
Spirit who proceeds"), they are stated to be one in all else, co-equal, co-eternal and consubstantial, and each is God, whole and entire.The above illustrates a reference to a perception of daily solar events involving the three "identities/figures" known as dawn-noon-dusk in relation to the one Sun. The Sun has three "persons" which are "related" to one another. The idea that the three moments of the Sun are persons is recognized when we take into account that these positions of the Sun were given individual names and were likewise viewed as separate but inter-connected gods. Hence, the Sun as a single Omnipotent God with three attendants or sons or personal characteristics were given individuality with such names as Horus (for dawn/morning) - Ra (for noon) - Atum/ Osiris (for dusk).
| Three | One (or unity) |
 |
 |
The very first three-in-one trinity was the worship of the three stages of the sun!
All three of course were one divinity being the sun. And so the main medium through which Satan was worshiped in Babylon was the sun. They noticed that the sun had three distinct stages and this fitted well with their belief as they were already worshiping three. Thus the sun was worshiped as three gods. The rising and new-born sun as it came to life, the mature and full-grown sun at noon, and the dying sun as it set at the end of the day. Yet while they worshiped the sun as three gods, they were not three gods but one god! So the rising sun was god, the midday sun was god, the setting sun was god, and yet there were not three gods but one god! In other words, 1+1+1=One! So here is the true absolute origin of the trinity doctrine. And this became incorporated into this mystery religion and the worship of Satan. "Three became the most universal number of deity. Sun worship is one of the most primitive forms of religion, and early man sometimes distinguished between rising, midday, and setting sun. The Egyptians, for example, divided the sun-god into three deities: Horus, rising sun, Ra or Re, midday sun, and Osiris, old setting sun." — (Egyptian Deities, New International Encyclopedia. NY: Dodd, 1917. Volume 7, p. 529) | |
Source for the first image and accompanying commentary: One Unity Or Quality?, also see a mirror image of the information at: The Pagan Origins of the Trinity Doctrine
While the association between the Sun... and its three phases as being the influence of "an early" trinity is correct, it also is which influenced the Christian Trinitarian doctrine as well, or so we may well surmise. Yet, to try to use the information to substantiate the view that those who believe in the Trinity are followers of Satan or are in general irreligious, is particularly humorous. The association needs to be taken out of the religious context in order to identify how wide-spread the solar influence may have had in biology, philosophy, mathematics, music, sociology, etc., whether or not partitioners of such subject areas are aware of the influence(s) or not... and whether or not this planetary event(s) is creating subtle changes that humanity needs to be aware of and respond to.
Once you get past all the religious jargon used as an embellishment to describe ancient solar impressions which were not (and are not, thus remaining as a mysterious impression interpreted as a revelation or imprint of [a] god); remaining allusively from any formal recognition on a conscious level as a geophysical event occurring outside of a religious context but being viewed through the world-view lens of those obsessed with an orientation towards mystery, mysticism, magicism/miraclism... the underlying meaning is a reference to the Sun as a three-to-one phenomena whose influence reverberates beyond the confines of religion into every sphere of life. As another example, when theologians argue that the "trinity" existed at the beginning of the Bible, they are actually quite correct since the Sun and its three moments existed not only before the Bible, but before humanity came into being. Notwithstanding, it should be mentioned that the "one" Sun (where its three distinctions are joined), can be described as a "unity". In past ages it was thought that man and woman were one and the same until they were cut or sectioned apart. Take a look at where the word "sex" came from:
sex (n.)
late 14c., "males or females collectively," from Latin sexus "a sex, state of being either male or female, gender," of uncertain origin. "Commonly taken with seco as division or 'half' of the race" [Tucker], which would connect it to secare "to divide or cut" (see section (n.)).
Online Etymology Dictionary
section (n.)
late 14c., "intersection of two straight lines; division of a scale;" from Old French section or directly from Latin sectionem (nominative sectio) "a cutting, cutting off, division," noun of action from past participle stem of secare "to cut," from PIE root *sek- "to cut." From 1550s as "act of cutting or dividing." Meaning "subdivision of a written work, statute, etc." is from 1570s. Meaning "a part cut off from the rest" is from early 15c.
section (v.)
"divide into sections," 1819, from section (n.). Related: Sectioned; sectioning.
| Trinitarian theologians believe that manifestations of the Trinity are made evident from the very beginning of the Bible. Genesis 1:1-3 posits God, His Spirit and the "creative word of God"[14][15] together in the initial Genesis creation narrative account. While the Fathers of the Church saw Old Testament elements such as the appearance of three men to Abraham in Book of Genesis, chapter 18, as foreshadowings of the Trinity, it was the New Testament that they saw as a basis for developing the concept of the Trinity. One of the most influential of the New Testament texts seen as implying the teaching of the Trinity was Matthew 28:19, which mandated baptizing "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit". Another New Testament text pointing to the Trinity was John 1:1-14, in which the inter-relationships of the Triune God are reflected in the gospel author's description of "the Word", again showing the elements of the Triune God and their eternal (always was, always is, and always shall be) existence. (Revelation 1:8) |
But recognizing that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity is an abstract way in which to describe the Sun's influence as an ancient object of worship, is only one example of how the Sun and its three "moments" have become manifest in other ideas. No less, the triplet code in DNA and RNA or more specifically, the "three to one" organization thereof, also reflects the 3 to 1 ratio of the Sun:
| Three | One |
| Dawn-Noon-Dusk | Sun |
| Adenosine-Cytosine-Guanine | DNA |
| Adenosine-Cytosine-Guanine | RNA |
| Primary-Secondary-Tertiary | Quaternary (proteins) |
| Paul-John-George (3 guitarists) | Ringo (drummer) |
| North-South-East | "and" West |
| 3 common years | 1 Leap year |
| 3 STOP codons | 1 START codon |
| 3 eye cones | 1 eye rod |
Page initially created: Friday, 17th August 2018... 4:36 AM
Page initially posted: Friday, 14th Septemeber 2018... 5:46 AM
Updated Posting: Friday, 13th September 2024... 7:25 AM
Herb O. Buckland
herbobuckland@hotmail.com