Threesology Research Journal: The Scientification of Philosophy by way of a Threes Model
Origination of the "Three"
The Barcode Model of Evolution
Oh My God!
Pg. 2

Flag Counter
Unconventional Thinkers as of Aug. 23rd, 2024

One Two Three

Please notice in the three-patterned phrase "Oh My God!" we do not also hear the variation of "Oh 'OUR' God". Is it a Freudian slip of the Tongue? While some say "Oh My Gosh" because they feel that to do otherwise it is an expressed exercise in taking the Lord's name in vain, most people apparently use the 3-lettered word "God" and not "Gosh" or "Oh My Golly", even though some say "Oh My Goodness" or use a cuss/curse word expletive. And notice also we say "THE Lord" and not "MY" or "OUR" Lord, though they may say "Oh My Lord" instead of "Oh My God". While the reader at this moment may make it a point to do other than use commonly used expressions, many people use the same expression, regardless of its intent as surprise, disgust, or whatever cuss word others are inclined to repetitively use instead.

However, the point I want to make is that a Three-patterned phase can have repetition, and if asked, the speakers of the phrase may say it has nothing to do with religion and instead resort defensively by calling it a common saying or expression. In fact, most people apparently do not analyze it and do not compare it with other expressions in terms of number pattern, much less engage in a mental exercise of diagramming sentences as some of us were instructed to do in Elementary school English class. Expressions can be analyzed in terms of quantity just as the number of times a person might characteristically knock on a door or move a paint brush or some other routinization in their life which might appear to an observer similar to a robotic-like or production line-like entrainment. Most people do not sit and count the number of times a person blinks, clears their throat or enumerate the topics of conversation brought up at a party. While there are a few such accountants, and all of us are accountants at one time or another, what sort of accounting method is being used? Sequential such as 1-2-3. Perhaps they use some form of binary code, or like myself, express a penchant for threes? Perhaps some think they are far too sophisticated in their thinking and thus would claim their cognitive activity is an infinitesimal Calculus, or a extra-terrestrial-like geometry.

Some of the common references to favorite numbers are based on birthdays, number of children, or some other personalized reference and not that which is external to oneself, though observations of externalized events may well be used to supportively buttress one's inclination.

Lots of people have recognized repeating patterns-of-three. Yet, some are transfixed on a singular repeating number. Still others say a particular number that crops up in their view is two-patterned such as 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, 99, 00, etc., and others claim theirs is three-patterned such as 000, 111, 222, 333, 444, 555, 666, 777, 888, 999, etc.; And yet, few of them are stepping back to view the totality of these occurrences as a 1 - 2 - 3 event. Let me list this:

  • Some are transfixed on a single digit repeating number. (examples are any of the numbers from 0... 9)
  • Some are transfixed on a double digit repeating number. (examples are the same number [00, 11, 22, 33...] or mixtures of any number from 0... 9; not excluding 2-digit fractions such as 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5...)
  • Some are transfixed on a triple digit repeating number. (examples are the same number [000, 111, 222, 333...] or mixtures of any number from 0... 9; not excluding 3-digit compound fractions such as 1 1/2, 2 1/3, 3 1/4, 4 1/5...)

...and we can even find some who are inclined to repeat the '3' with a repeating supplementation such as the 3-part "3.14" (which is Einstein's birthday of March 14th) and is a common reference to the mathematically observed Pi. It is a figure that is given a day of celebration: Pi Day, even though there are other important Mathematical constants as described here: The 10 Most Important Numbers In The World.

Others try to extend this 3+ (Pi) configuration as if in doing so they are much smarter in their particular social setting, but are oblivious to the fact that the "3" is a primary focal point from which the memorization is extended. In such a case they may extend the recital to ten places: 3.1415926535..., as if ten places is sufficient to convince those in their particular social setting that they should be recognized for accomplishing something extra-ordinary. One person who is capable of doing a much larger recital in their head is Daniel Tammet. Here is an historical list of those taking an interest in Pi and engage in its calculation: Chronology of computation of Pi. Note that the larger computations are being exercised by those using computers because the human capacity for doing so has a limitation because human life has a limitation that we might cite as a "conservation of number" expressed survival mechanism. In other words, life is very short and to accomplish something within the time period we must be intensively oriented but make an allowance for frugality based on an honest observation of by pursuing the apportioned probability of a recognized potentiality which persists. The present record at this time is Pi calculated to 105 Trillion digits. It is an expressed one-upmanship game that I similarly see when I ask a large group of people to tell me their favorite number. While most will say single, double or triple digits, there may be one in the crowd who provides Pi out to several digits or some other number larger than anyone else in the particular crowd being addressed... as if in doing so it makes them somehow special to provide a number beyond the convention used by most people... yet it needs to be mentioned that some people claim not to have a favorite number, color, food, beverage, type of clothing, etc...

The overall expressed human cognitive behavior in this instance is itself an enumerated pattern-of-three. A Numerologist reading this might well use the information to exploit people in order to make a buck. Like so many others I have encountered, they use information to manipulate others to make some purchase or sacrifice some property such as money, goods, services (labor/sex), property, position, etc... My interest is to point out that "threes" research has variability (like the languages on a Rosetta Stone or Behistun Rock Formation or Galle inscription) and suggests an origin which can be deciphered, below the obvious textual illustrations.

Here's a list of Bilingual and Trilingual Archeological finds:

Singular Inscriptions Bilingual Inscriptions Trilingual Inscriptions Four or more
There are multiple single
language inscriptions.
Example: Voynich manuscript
(1404–1438). Undecipherable
because it contains more than
one language?

And if we include different
types of expressions such as
tool making, clothing, art,
burials, cooking, etc...?		 The Bilingual Inscription of Kulamanu from Karatepe (8th BC)
The Sardis Bilingual Inscription (4th BC)
Meroitic scripts of the Kingdom of Kush (3rd BC)
The Pyrgi Tablets [on 3 plates] (500 BC)
The Idalion Bilingual (388 BC)

...The Ptolemic Decrees:

Decree of Alexandria {Ptolemy III} (243 BC)
Decree of Canopus {Ptolemy III} (239 BC)
[Described as a Bilingual Trigraphic account]
Rosetta Stone Decree {Ptolemy V} (196 BC)
[Described as a Bilingual Tri-scriptural account]		 The Behistun Inscription (522–486 BC)
The Xanthian Obelisk (400 BC)
The Letoon Trilingual Stele (337/336 BC ???)
The Canopus Decree {Canopus Stone} (239 BC)
[Described as having 3 languages]
The Rosetta Stone {Ptolemy V} (196 BC)
[Described as having 3 languages]
King Ezana’s Stone (4th AD)
The Galle Trilingual Inscription (1411 AD)		 (see list below)

Please note the abundance of Bilingual transcriptions in earlier times and later ages there were Trilingual inscriptions which were inter-spersed with Bilingual, Triscriptural/Trigraphic formulas. It suggests we can identify a change (or at least an attempted change) in cognition from a two-patterned orientation to a Three-patterned one. This interpretation should be of interest to Archaeologists studying cognitive transitions. However, by looking at a List of Multilingual Inscriptions, we can see historically early examples of inscriptions with more than 3 languages. The use of more than one language, in many cases three, is commonly seen on instructions pamphlets because of the global marketplace many types of businesses are engaged in. The larger the audience the more languages... but even this activity is a costly printing option that business owners must make a choice of which languages to translated and print, leading to a Conservation of Number.

Bilinguals Of Ancient Scripts

Important bilinguals include:

  • the first known Sumerian-Akkadian bilingual tablet dating to the reign of Rimush, circa 2270 BCE.[1][2]
  • the Urra=hubullu tablets (c. 2nd millennium BCE; Babylon) in Sumerian and Akkadian; one tablet is a Sumerian-Hurrian bilingual glossary.
  • the bilingual Ebla tablets (2500–2250 BCE; Syria) in Sumerian and Eblaite
  • the bilingual Ugarit Inscriptions (1400–1186 BCE; Syria):[3]
    • tablets in Akkadian and Hittite
    • tablets in Akkadian and Hieroglyphic Luwian
    • tablets in Sumerian and Akkadian
    • tablets in Ugaritic and Akkadian
  • the Karatepe Bilingual (8th century BCE; Osmaniye Province, Turkey) in Phoenician and Hieroglyphic Luwian
  • the Tell el Fakhariya Bilingual Inscription (9th century BCE; Al-Hasakah Governorate, Syria) in Aramaic and Akkadian
  • the Çineköy inscription (8th century BCE; Adana Province, Turkey) in Hieroglyphic Luwian and Phoenician
  • the Assyrian lion weights (8th century BCE; Nimrud, Iraq) in Akkadian (Assyrian dialect, using cuneiform script) and Aramaic (using Phoenician script)
  • the Kandahar Edict of Ashoka (3rd century BCE; Afghanistan) in Ancient Greek and Aramaic
  • the Amathus Bilingual (600 BCE; Cyprus) in Eteocypriot and Ancient Greek (Attic dialect)
  • the Idalion bilingual inscription that helped to decipher the Cypro-Syllabic script
  • the Pyrgi Tablets (500 BCE; Lazio, Italy) in Etruscan and Phoenician
  • the Kaunos Bilingual (330–300 BCE; Turkey), in Carian and Ancient Greek
  • the Philae obelisk (118 BCE; Egypt), in Egyptian hieroglyphs and Ancient Greek
  • the Rosetta Stone Series, in Egyptian (using Hieroglyphic and Demotic scripts) and Ancient Greek; they allowed the decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs (especially the last one)
    • the Raphia Decree (217 BCE; Memphis, Egypt)
    • the Decree of Canopus (238–237 BCE; Tanis, Egypt)
    • the Rosetta Stone decree (196 BCE; Egypt): the Rosetta Stone and the Nubayrah Stele
  • the Cippi of Melqart (2nd century BCE; Malta) in Phoenician and Ancient Greek; discovered in Malta in 1694, the key which allowed French scholar Abbé Barthelemy to decipher the Phoenician script
  • the Punic-Libyan Inscription (146 BCE; Dougga, Tunisia) in Libyan and Punic; from the Mausoleum of Ateban, now held at the British Museum, it allowed the decipherment of Libyan
  • the Monumentum Ancyranum inscription (14 CE; Ankara, Turkey) in Latin and Greek; it reproduces and translates the Latin inscription of the Res Gestae Divi Augusti
  • the Stele of Serapit (150 CE; Kartli, Tbilisi) in Ancient Greek and Armazic (a local variant of Aramaic)
  • the Velvikudi inscription (8th century; India) in Sanskrit and Tamil
  • the Valun tablet (11th century; Cres, Croatia) in Old Croatian (using Glagolitic script) and Latin
  • the Muchundi Inscription (13th century; Kozhikode, India) in Arabic and Malayalam
  • the Kalyani Inscriptions (1479; Bago, Burma) in Mon and Pali (using Burmese script)

The manuscript titled Relación de las cosas de Yucatán (1566; Spain) shows the de Landa alphabet (and a bilingual list of words and phrases), written in Spanish and Mayan; it allowed the decipherment of the Pre-Columbian Maya script in the mid-20th century.

Trilinguals of Ancient Scripts

Important trilinguals include:

  • the trilingual Aphek-Antipatris inscription (1550–1200 BCE; Tell Aphek, Israel) in Sumerian, Akkadian and Canaanite; it is a lexicon
  • the trilingual Ugarit Inscriptions (1400–1186 BCE; Syria):
    • a dictionary (13th century BCE) in Sumerian, Akkadian and Hurrian.
    • a literary text in Sumerian, Akkadian and Hittite; it was imported from Hattusa.[3]
  • the Achaemenid royal inscriptions in Old Persian, Elamite and Akkadian (Babylonian dialect); it allowed the decipherment of cuneiform script
  • the Xanthos Obelisk (500 BCE; Xanthos, Turkey) in Ancient Greek, Lycian and Milyan
  • the Van Fortress inscription (5th century BCE; Van, Turkey) in Old Persian, Akkadian (Babylonian dialect), and Elamite; it allowed the decipherment of Old Persian.
  • the Letoon trilingual (358–336 BCE; Turkey), in standard Lycian or Lycian A, Ancient Greek and Aramaic
  • the Ezana Stone (356 CE; Aksum, Ethiopia) in Ge'ez, Sabaean and Ancient Greek
  • the Monumentum Adulitanum (3rd century CE; Adulis, Eritrea) in Ge'ez, Sabaean and Ancient Greek
  • the trilingual epitaph for Meliosa (5th–6th century; Tortosa, Spain) in Hebrew, Latin and Greek; the Jewish headstone includes a pentagram and a five-branched menorah in the Latin text.[4]
  • the BommalaGutta Inscription (900-950 CE in Kurikyala, Karimnagar, Telangana, India) in Telugu, Kannada and Sanskrit. This inscription contains some of the earliest poetry in Telugu and Kannada , which ensures the classical language tag to the languages.
  • the Galle Trilingual Inscription (1409; Southern Province, Sri Lanka) in Chinese, Tamil and Persian
  • the Yongning Temple Stele (1413; Tyr, Russia) in Chinese, Mongolian and Jurchen; see below.
  • the Shwezigon Pagoda Bell Inscription (1557; Bagan, Burma) in Burmese, Mon and Pali
Quadrilinguals of Ancient Scripts

Important quadrilinguals include:

  • the quadrilingual Ugarit Inscription (c. 14th century BC; Syria) in Sumerian, Akkadian, Hurrian and Ugaritic.[3]
  • the Myazedi inscription (1113; Bagan, Burma) in Burmese, Pyu, Mon and Pali; it allowed the decipherment of Pyu.
  • the Yongning Temple Stele (1413, Tyr, Russia) in Chinese (using Traditional characters), Jurchen, Mongolian (using Mongolian script) and Classical Tibetan;
  • the Buddhist mantra Om mani padme hum is transcribed from Sanskrit using 4 scripts arranged vertically on sides, and there is another Chinese text engraved on
  • the front with abbreviated Mongolian & Jurchen translations on the back.
Ancient Inscriptions in five or more languages

Important examples in five or more languages include:

  • the Sawlumin inscription (1053–1080; Myittha Township, Burma) in Burmese, Pyu, Mon, Pali and Sanskrit (or Tai-Yuan, Gon (Khun or Kengtung) Shan; in Devanagari script)
  • the Cloud Platform at Juyong Pass inscriptions (1342–1345; Beijing, China) in Sanskrit (using the Tibetan variant of Ranjana script called Lanydza), Classical Tibetan, Mongolian (using 'Phags-pa script), Old Uyghur (using Old Uyghur script), Chinese (using Traditional characters) and Tangut; it engraves two different Buddhist dharani-sutras transcriptions from Sanskrit using 6 scripts, another text ("Record of Merits in the Construction of the Pagoda") in 5 languages (without Sanskrit version), and a Chinese & Tangut summary of one dharani-sutra.
  • the Stele of Sulaiman (1348; Gansu, China) in Sanskrit, Classical Tibetan, Mongolian, Old Uyghur, Chinese and Tangut (like the inscriptions at Juyong Pass); the Buddhist mantra Om mani padme hum is transcribed from Sanskrit using 6 scripts (last 4 arranged vertically), below another Chinese engraving.

The more than three usage of languages in ancient history are exceptions to be clearly noted just as we might take note of some unusual Anthropological find characterized as belonging to the human lineage, but where along the line-up we may not yet know where or how such a species occurred or actually fits. Yes, there are anomalies, mutations, and elaborations which take place in different subjects or fields of research, but even these anomalies are subjected to a conservation of number. It;s not that Nature and Humanity can not think or act outside the recurring 1- 2- 3 box, it is simply that Nature and Humanity are being forced by the incrementally deteriorating planetary system (interactions of the Sun, Earth, Moon) to adopt a Conservation of Number as a survival mechanism and re-adapt to its regulation if we try to venture beyond it... with several attempts using the "3" as the height of the bar they must exceed. An example of an exception is seen when most people have one, two, or three personal names, while a few in history used multiple ones which may include a place where they are from, a title, and even a business connection. Establishing one's presumed importance with a long name was a type of language in itself. To use such an appelation could be presumed to represent someone of high standing, thereby being used as a shield against those who would think to to them harm. Here is a reference to the used of long names: Discovering the History of Long Last Names.

We see a similarity of transition in how humans have adopted personal naming. For example, long ago a "cave"-person may have been recognized as having one name such as "ugh". Over time, singular names gave way to two names such as Ping Pong, whereas in the Chinese tradition the Surname came first. Later on, people adopted the three- part Roman naming convention called the Tria Nomina:

  1. Praenomen: The first name, used to identify individuals within their family.
  2. Nomen: The family name, indicating a person's gens or clan.
  3. Cognomen: A nickname or additional identifier used to distinguish individuals within the gens.

While not everyone today uses a first, middle, and last name... and many of us are acknowledged by our familiars with a single name or singular-or double-or triple nickname, including the many gang names— and abbreviations used by government agencies, Corporations, ideas, instruments, procedures, etc... (AAA, BBC, CDC, DOD, ESP, FBI, EEG, GMO, HMS, IBM, JAG/JFK, KKK, LOL, Mom, Non-/NBA, OAC/OAP, Pop, QED, RAP, SOS, TNT, USA, VHF, WHO, XYZ, Yada-Yada-Yada, ZZZ (snoring)); the point is that we can recognize a developmental change that can be recognized and organized with a 1-2-3 seriation. And yes, there are those who have used multiple names in line with their boisterous ego, this is not the convention we have seen with humanity over time and in multiple areas. In other words, we do not see a majority of people using this naming formula.

One of the recurring arguments against "Threes" research is made by those who point out some other number pattern which they could make a collection of such as ones, twos, fours, fives, sixes, sevens, eights, nines, tens, etc... And yet these same people fail to acknowledge that if they were to make a a list of these numbers they would alternatively use; they would find only a handful of numbers repeated again and again, with some being used more often than others (suggesting both an individual and collective preference)... despite the fact that humanity supposedly has an infinity of numbers it has access to. For example, while it is easy to claim your favorite number is 13, your attempt to make a list falls far short of the quantity and quality of examples found in other number (as well as geometric) patterns, not to mention if you took the time to collect those numbers commonly used in collections of enumeration, you would find a very small percentage of numbers...

...Hence, they do not reach the point in their consciousness to acknowledge that there is an identifiable "Conservation of Number" being imposed on humanity by what I think is an incrementally deteriorating planetary environment which initially influenced the patterning which humanity has enumerated. Only a handful of numbers are designated as being one's "favorite". Others have different labeling such as being an Angel number, sacred number, good/bad luck number, number associated with evil, etc... All too often I see a discussion about recurring numbers where the view about double and triple configurations is not even recognized by the author or commentators. An example can be found here: The Mystery of Recurring Numbers. (Note: I left a comment... but like most sites, my views are omitted because they do not reinforce the personalized "seeking personal signification" attitudes and "mystery-indulged" orientation of the person monitoring comments.)

Here is the symbol for Infinity: ∞. For those of you who are mathematically inclined... Here is your problem: mathematically express the quantity of numbers humans do not commonly use. Intuitively we say that humans do not use most numbers available to us. While we use every singular digit from zero to nine, all the possible combinations are not being commonly used. Only a handful. If we remove digital uses, the "commonly used" definition shrinks considerably. If you look at the practice of most Numerologists, they use only a handful of numbers to provide some meaning to... particularly make an inquiry about a given number or number repetition, and they think they might be entice you to make one or another purchase from them. If we remove all commercially oriented exploitations of number-related referencing, the "commonly used" numbers shrinks further. Whether it be associated with the number of crops, shipments of cotton, loaves of bread, or whatever. In common conversations you may not hear anyone providing a number, though some reference to a particular quantity is made. Yet, the pool of numbers being used is quite small. The "three" is one of those numbers frequently used in multiple subjects, just as are other numbers, but when placed side by side, we can reference some number quantities (or as a quality) being used more often than others.

Note: I have been writing about the present ideas for decades in various captions, footnotes, and marginalia. In as much as it begin as a bits and pieces adventure since childhood, a more indulged level of interest was brought about not only by extended periods of time incurred by failed employment, failed relationships, failed Entrepreneur-ships (at building a better mousetrap, source of fire, a rounder wheel), but by a persistent "3rd person presence" that I have frequently written of as a "spectre" or "something there" in poems and a personal journal in which I have inscribed multiple events of three-patterned experiences occurred. In particular, a distinctly audible three knocks recurrence which have frequently awaken me at night as if to signal a need for wakefulness as a safeguard against biological rhythms which slowed to life-threatening levels. I know this activity occurs because an overnight stay in the hospital in which nearby University students were doing internships... had reported to their professor they thought I was going to die because my heart beat went so low, and she told me because I was one of her patients. I recall having practiced bio-feedback in which I would spend intervals of time trying to control my breath and heartbeat.

The multiple ideas which were eventually seen as fragments of a larger composite picture, took place at most times in a creeping fashion into consciousness to form a supposition derived from a Devil's Advocate contentiousness while at other moments they have forced themselves... quite boldly I might add, into the forefront of conceptualization in whatever crude cosmetic credential they may be modulated for a given moment of contemplation. The fact that one can see other-than-the-"three" recurring patterns required a much larger encapsulated idea in order to adequately address seeming unrelated observations and operations of disparate patterns. In other words, a philosophy involving the "three" required a clear means of reconciling what appeared to be arguments against profiling the "3" as representing something other than the common explanations embodied in the words superstition, spirituality, coincidence, obsession, mysticism, magic number, culture, Universal theme, mystery, 'reasons lost in antiquity' or any other commonly accepted notion one might use regarding the "3". In reflection over many years, I have come to pay witness to the ongoing compilation of different "Threes: Models as provisions providing a new take not only on (supplementation of) Evolution, but also eventually proving to undermine the accepted conventional ideas concerning the different types of triads (and multiples thereof) found in religion and mythology. Though the Pantheons of triads, trios, threesomes (etc.) labeled as Religion or Mythology have different names derived from the language of a given Culture, we of today recognize and acknowledge the "three" plays an underlying, if not definitive role in the multiple, individualized conceptualizations thereof. While the Battle field has not yet been named, warriors from different walks of life have begun to align themselves under a 3s Banner.

Just as we might list collectors of Natural phenomena such as Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778), William Buckland (1784-1856), Mary Anning (1799-1847),Charles Darwin (1809-1882), Kjell Bloch Sandved (1922-2015), Ancient Natural History philosophers in different countries, etc... and perhaps prehistoric others who presumptively began collecting examples of birds, sea shells, flowers, leaves, butterflies, rocks, bones, insects, etc., a collection of "threes" ideas gives the impression of being a reoccurring Natural event of human activity which has been undertaken as a collectible item by multiple others..., yet the frequency for collecting different cognitive species of "threes" appears to have increased over time... no doubt in part do to an increase in human population with its many repetitions.

Yet not only are different contours of "threes" being collected, but we can see an increased usage in different genres of writing, music, and other subject areas... no doubt as a copycat exercise by those who want to imitate those writers who have managed to garner a living and notoriety in which a pattern-of-three formula is used (though not necessarily publicly acknowledged), but also in part due to the salesmanship of influencers who may at times express the "three" as a hook, magic number, sacred number or some other attribute which stirs some level of intrigue in a reader or listener. Unfortunately for this type of "presentational" research, most people indulge in repeating (and frequently expanding on) the collections of those they have come across who defined the "3" in terms of some connection with religion that was deemed sacred, divine or spiritual; resulting in lists which portray threes items mostly from mythology and religion. While those in the past can be forgive for their lack of knowledge derived from one or more sciences, those compiling lists of "threes" or some other enumerated pattern today have little excuse, particularly when public education provides children with multiple examples such as the three extent body parts of insects (Head- Thorax- Abdomen), three large atomic particles (neutrons- protons- electrons), and the three general divisions of Earth labeled as core- mantle- crust. Not to mention 3 colors to traffic lights, holding a pen or pencil with 3 fingers and ending a sentence with either a period- question mark- exclamation point. No less when writing a story, children may be taught to use the formula of beginning- middle- end, or/and title- body- conclusion.

Though Darwin is credited with the discovery of Evolution by means of Natural descent (later being given support by other scientific studies in other fields), the term 'evolution' was coined by English philosopher Herbert Spencer which means: "The process of continuous change". However, The first theory of evolution was given by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829). He first proposed the theory of the transmutation of species. Without an idea called Evolution, all the specimens collected by all researchers would be little more than a list of similarities. This is where research in the "threes phenomena" has remained for centuries. There has been little advancement because the idea of the "3" in relation to other patterns, has not been viewed in terms of a developmental scenario. Whereas the idea of Evolution applied to different species has enabled some to recognize similarities in structure, not so is the case with enumeration. Taking inanimate structures such as numbers and aligning them with the idea of animation and animation with evolution is a transition of thinking that is considerably difficult for some, even though they may be an expert in their own respective field of interest. Whereas you could go to the Galapagos Islands and make a collection of finches like Darwin did, you would be hard pressed to create a philosophy that could be extended to other life forms, without having some consideration of a developmental sequence.

Date of Origination: Aug. 9th, 2024... 4:30 AM
Initial Posting: Aug. 23rd, 2024... 5:33 AM
Update: Aug. 23th, 2024... 6:40 AM