Threesology Research Journal: Evolutionary Psychdynamics
Evolutionary Psychodynamics 9
(Realization of Trichotomic Thinking)
→→→ Tripartite Collection 1 ←←←


EP 1 EP 2 EP 3 EP 4 EP 5 EP 6
EP 7 EP 8 EP 9 EP 10 EP 11 EP 12


Flag Counter
Detectives of the Mind as of Nov. 22, 2024

Yes, if you look for patterns you can find them. I say this up-front because it is a common refrain I have heard from those who are actually taken aback by my recital of a few examples concerning patterns-of-three as if being confronted by someone with a gun shooting at them, and for some reason they have to shoot back... much like some instructors who are confronted by students wanting to knock them off their knowledge edifice by introducing some idea that they think has relevancy, only to be confronted once more by a shotgun blast, or tossed grenade that the entire class is subjected to by being given more homework because the confrontation reveals that the students appear not to be following the discussions.

Finding a particular pattern is much like when you have your mind on a type of vehicle you can more easily spot them, whereas before you became interested, they were like so many other vehicles which become a daunting blur. However, if we were to make a count of all the available types of vehicles, we would encounter a limit. Not only in aerodynamic design, but overall quantity, though in some cities you can find entire large blocks presenting you with a type of vehicle city, where a car lot may display a single make or multiple makes, depending on their trade-in policy. Let us review some limitations:

  • The quantity and quality of sports cards a person or business may own.
  • The quantity of cards and their respective enumerations, where the number 10 is the last, but the face cards may be used to quantify larger quantities such as the Queen of spades sometimes referenced as "Queen 40" (worth 40 points in the game of rummy).
  • The typical quantity of shoes affluent people may own as compared to the less affluent.
  • The quantity of rooms in a building, the quantity of life boats on a large ship, the horsepower -to- weight ratio used by auto manufacturers.
  • The quantity of tools in a professional mechanic's tool box, as opposed to those who use a kitchen drawer as a tool box.
  • The quantity of bullets in guns, the quantity of torpedoes on a submarine, the quantity of grenades a soldier carries.
  • The quantity of households a Social worker is commissioned to take care of.
  • The shelf life limit of all life forms.
  • etc...

A Science of Limitation is not routinely considered, thus we have no large data base of examples from which patterns may be established except for the limitation for which the word "Conservation" may be applied. Instead of seeking patterns in the limitations, we humans instead construct fanciful tales of regeneration, sometimes referred to as cyclicity, rejuvenation, reincarnation, and established systems of memory such as a holiday remembering an event, or those who participated in an event that a family, group, city, state or Nation may observe from year to year... and yet, not even these are without limitation.

If a civilization dies, so may their practiced celebrations and observances. Or if they are kept, they may be transformed in some way by the adoption of others such as the practice of Christmas world wide... except for perhaps in those countries which do not have an orientation towards Christianity. Other countries may provide their own traditions such as Mexico's Cinco De Mayo, whose actual meaning has been lost to many, but because of a migration into the US by large numbers of Mexicans, the celebration is sometimes practiced by other Americans as well. However, the point is, that such practices do have a limitation, much like the dinosaurs, who may have lived till today if not killed off by an assumed Asteroid; at least that is what has been considered. While some species seem to be long- lived, let us note that they have not lived since the beginning of the Earth. And though cockroaches and some reptiles have been around for a long time, their adaptability for survival is not necessarily the qualities humans would like to incorporate in their genome. Being transformed into a cockroach is far too much cross-dressing for most people.

Just like we find a limit to the number of elements in the periodic table and every single alphabet, including the 0-9 lineage of numbers. With respective to recurring cognitive forms of enumeration, we can see that some numbers appear to have a more frequency of usage than others, like the usage of the letter "e" being dominant in the game of scrabble. All of these are recognizable patterns which may exhibit a different quantity, but the quantities nonetheless exhibit a limitation. Whether you prefer the number 2 or 7 or 13 or whatever, you are working with a limitation which needs to be compared side by side with other patterns of routine usage. Using a graph, you will notice distinct differences but that all told, we are dealing with an overall CONSERVATION OF Number related to a survival requirement that appears to be changing over time, but we will not know this unless myself and others take the time to make a record of the patterns. Even if in a thousand years my as yet untested assumptions are faulty or wrong, we humans need to know this in order that we can say that Yes... we did consider it.

By utilizing a pattern-of-three typology model, let me bring an alternative view of Intelligent Design mixed with Evolution and multiple other subjects. While many people in their respective interest in a given subject have sought out fundamentals, one must wonder why it is that we have only seen very small sketches of a Pattern-of-three profile typically dealing with religious topics, mythology, fairy tales, writing instruction, speeches, superstition, Numerology and selective groupings in a specific genre such as cartoon characters, a given sport, and those compilations which are copycat renditions by those who make an attempt to compile longer than the typical handful of examples taken from history, slogans, and various memorabilia covering bits and pieces of different subjects, and yet never speak to the fact that their list is such a compilation of multiple others' similar efforts. In other words, many people who present a public list of "threes" (or some other pattern) do not openly state that either the list is of their own making or the result of a compilation of one or more other-than-themselves sources.

Those who speak of an Intelligent Design don't bother to provide their own itemized design to enhance elucidation and instead argue against other designs which are thought to contradict their own summations and contentions, such as that denoted as Evolution; as if Evolution described THE design of biology specific to the development of humanity, when it actually expresses the vague overview of a possibility that has garnered some evidence... similar to the efforts of those extracting information from the bible and declaring that the recording of an historical event somehow means the whole content of the Bible is thus correct, when it is but a Metaphysical hypothesis which relies on the speciousness of words such as faith and belief as if they were synonymous with truth, while Evolution ranks as a bona fide theory because of its subjection to thousands of testable queries.

Whereas both the Bible and Evolution provide us with chronologies of development, identified facts of historical occurrence does not support any contention that the overall idea proposed by Religion or present Science, reveal a substantive value of being an absolute truth. Whereas other chronologies exist such as that expressed by geology, it is not without its controversies. The same can be said for weather prediction, causes for climate change, and even trends in fashion, music, art, mathematics, astronomy, warfare, etc... Each of them have their chronologies from beginning to some future point, with multiple digressions sometimes encountered. In short, they are histories whose errors are not the result of any inherent fault but the fault of interpretations, representations and reception by other experts and the general public.

Sometimes we even come across a bit of history that has been overlooked by both experts and the general public who therefore do not initially know what to make of information which is easily understood as a rational and logical correlation by being so obvious as to be a cause of quietly expressed astonishment in the form of a momentary befuddlement of readjusting the contour of one's mental alignment with the reality which they have incorporated as some sort of standardized truth accepted by millions, and yet may reject the information for awhile to see whether any of the experts they routinely go to for verification of their ideas have made mention of it. If they haven't, then a new idea may be readily dismissed. Such is the case not only for the ubiquity of "threes" and the 3-to-1 pattern for which a timeline can be established in conjunction with already established chronologies, but the oversight having been made by geologists who create charts and posters describing life forms occurring over vast expanses of geological time. What is missing? The correlation of how fast the Earth was spinning at those different moments in history when significant biological events were taking place. The situation is so obvious and distinctive once pointed out, it should be a point of embarrassment for all the so-called experts and instructors of such chronologies.

Let me provide two variations of the same idea because of their relevance to the present threes design-ation:

Earth's Rotation Rate Over Time

A timeline of some non-human threes events.

Call "threes" research pseudo-science, call it idiocy, call it simplistic correlation or call it whatever you want, but we must address the possibility that Evolution may have a time-line specificity fixed to the rate of the Earth's rotation rate, by which predictions of future events may be secured... if only in terms of human cognition with respect to repetitions of patterning. And along this course we can map out recurring developmental patterns due to regression, overlap, reversal, mutation, digression, multiplicity, enumerated incrementalism, punctuation, gradualism, etc., whether you describe them as the act of god or the act of Evolution; or defined as god's use of evolution or evolution's use of god expressed as a drama of the human psyche that is in a primitive stage of development. Threes research is a tool. Instead of just a pair of binoculars, we have a microscope and telescope as well. It helps to recognize the extent to which other patterns are being used, or not used, and how they are being used.

If the usage of a "threesological" approach is later found to be at fault or even wrong, we at least know it is a dead end channel to tune into... at least in a particular setting by someone who has worked out the specificities of another idea which is better suited to their ideological orientation. Our own efforts at testability will not have to align our approach with other speculations which are created by those who do not strive for a testability nor allow themselves to be open for corrections that others make and may be so obvious that one realizes their rational approach was bridled with irrational constraints. As Edison is attributed to saying... he had not failed, he had found 10,000 ways something didn't work. Yet, we wouldn't know this if he hadn't tried and his efforts weren't recorded.

Trying to describe developmental cognition can be described in a type of antiquated human scenario: It is like more modernized humans called Cro-magnons having to deal with the behaviors of Neanderthals who were relatively peaceful but generally practicing an antiquated ideological standard of perception and conclusion regarding reality, which created multiple ideological handicaps in the landscape of cognitive development; which creates the necessity of configuring insulated cultural environments of separatism, revealing just how much the human mind is attempting to evolve without resorting to base behaviors such as experimental sexuality that tried and failed many times in the past because physiological constraints dictate a simple orientation for survival purposes for the species and not simplistic emotional concerns of personalized limitation such as expressed by old, middle-aged, and young adolescents who join the Narcissitic gang called the LGBTQ+ whether as a practicing member or in a supportive role.

With respect to the present pattern-of-three model of analysis, it is an hypothesis with the added feature of an as yet unrecognized (by others) testability to endow it with the status of being a Theory which, once established... will become a recurringly testable fact (like Evolution and other Sciences) that will be refined from its presently crude/fledgling state... as we move further into the future. (It is so new that the word "Trichotomization" does not even exist in the vocabulary of Psychology, though many older reflective psychologists are aware of the preponderant usage of dichotomies being used in the various approaches of teaching and patient care.) What is being described is a developmental trend of human cognition over long expanses of time where various models from different subjects reveal a recurring consistency, just like we see thousands of different life forms and yet all have the same underlying pattern of a triplet (DNA) code which also occurred in a maturational development way, though other patterns are collectably available as supportive evidence. (Origin and Evolution of DNA and DNA Replication Machineries) A simple analogy is to think of it in terms of a metamorphosis, where identifiable changes can take place, but is not guaranteed due to health, environment, underlying biology, etc... (And yes, variations of the list exist elsewhere at this site and others):

3 ideas about the geometry of the Universe

The old English ynce was defined by King David I of Scotland about 1150 as the breadth of a man's thumb at the base of the nail. To help maintain consistency of the unit, the measure was usually achieved by adding the thumb breadth of three men—one small, one medium, and one large— and then dividing the figure by three. During the reign of King Edward II, in the early 14th century, the inch was defined as "three grains of barley, dry and round, placed end to end lengthwise." At various times the inch has also been defined as the combined lengths of 12 poppy-seeds. Since 1959 the inch has been defined officially as 2.54 cm. ("inch." Encyclopædia Britannica, 2013.)

Introduction to 3 -to- 1 ratio references using common ideas:

3 to 1 ratio of dimensions
  • 3 to 1 ratio of dimensions: 3 spatial (Width- Length- Height) and 1 Time dimension.
  • 3 to 1 ratio of fundamental forces:
    • 3 included in the Standard Model frame work: Strong, Weak, Electro-magnetic
    • 1 not included in the Standard Model: Gravity
  • 3 families of fundamental particles developed by humans and crafted by using mathematics:
    • Leptons - Quarks - Bosons (according to the Standard Model of particle physics)
    • Electron - Muon - Tau (particles which characterize the 3 families)
    • 3 families of particles based on decay rate: Stable- Unstable- Highly unstable.
  • 3 large particles (Protons- Neutrons- Electrons)
  • 3 X 3 arrangement of quarks for Protons and Neutrons
  • 3rds fractionation used to describe energy consolidations in particle species:
    • UP quark flavor = 2/3rds.
    • TOP quark flavor = 2/3rds.
    • CHARMED quark flavor = 2/3rds.
    • DOWN quark flavor = 1/3rd.
    • BOTTOM quark flavor = 1/3rd.
    • STRANGE quark flavor = 1/3rd.
  • 3 Main forms of radioactive emissions: Alpaha- Beta- Gamma
  • 3 manifest large objects of space: Sun- Earth- Moon
  • 3 spectrums of solar Emissions affect life: Dawn- Noon- Dusk supported by a duality: Night/Day
  • 3 historical conceptions of the Sun's daily passage: Across the sky (Linear)- Over the sky (Circular/Dome)- Triangular (seen more clearly with time-elapsed photography).
  • 3rd planet (Earth) is only place Life originates on (so far as we know).
  • 3rd planet has three basic divisions: core- mantle- crust
  • 3 colloquial terms to describe Earth's terrains: Land- Sea- Air
  • 3 historically noted weather phenomena correlations: Lightning- Thunder- Rain
  • 3 to 1 ratio of directions: North- South- East (and) West.
  • 3 to 1 ratio of written mathematical notation: Ones- Tens- Hundreds (comma) Thousands...
  • 3 groups of eight main cloud families divided on the basis of altitude: ("cloud." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2013)
    • High clouds, found at heights of 13 to 5 km (42,500 to 16,500 feet): are cirrus, cirrocumulus, and cirrostratus.
    • Middle clouds, 7 to 2 km (23,000 to 6,500 feet), are altocumulus and altostratus.
    • Low clouds, 2 to 0 km (6,500 to 0 feet), are stratocumulus, stratus, and nimbostratus.
      • A cloud that extends through all three heights is called a cumulonimbus. A cloud at the surface is called a fog.
  • 3 biologically significant Strandedness distinctions with a 1- 2- 3 expression:
    • Single Stranded RNA- with a triplet code.
      • 3 main types of RNA: Messenger RNA (mRNA)- Transfer RNA (tRNA)- Ribosomal RNA (rRNA)
    • Double Stranded DNA with a triplet code.
      • 3 main types of DNA: A-DNA, B-DNA, Z-DNA
    • Triple Stranded Proteins (made of amino acids).
      • 3 stop codons in amino acids are UAA, UAG, and UGA, and the 1 start codon is AUG. (Which can be referred to as a 3 to 1 ratio.)
    • RNA with its single strandedness is thought to have come first (called the RNA world)... with a triplet code.
    • DNA with its double strandedness is thought to have come second... with a triplet code.
    • RNA and DNA both use the same three amino acids (Adenosine- Cytosine- Guanine), with RNA having the additional Uracil and DNA having Thymine. (this can be referred to as a 3 to 1 ratio, similar to that pattern seen in Mendelian Genetics.)
    • Proteins apparently followed next in the developmental line of successive development that we might playfully call a (poker? old maid? rummy?) card game. Proteins have 3 folding structures (secondary-tertiary-quaternary) and 1 non-folding structure (primary). This can be referred to as a 3 to 1 ratio. In a deck of cards we have 3 face cards (King- Queen- Jack) and 1 non-face, but equally powerful Ace card.
    • Collagen's triple strandedness (connective tissue protein) followed afterwards.
    • 3 main amino acids make collagen: Proline- Glycine- Hydroxyproline. These group together to form protein fibrils in a triple helix structure.

    The Christian concept called the Trinity is sometimes expressed as a 3 -to- 1 ratio: Three persons in 1 Godhead. In primitive counting sequences we may note that any quantity beyond the "2" value may contain the concept of more, heap, pile, much, a lot, Many... Hence, the value of 3 or more was connected with some language equivalent expression of "Many". We see this expressed in the E Pluribus Unm phrase found on the US Presidential Seal which is Latin for "Out of Many, One." Hence, a variation of the 3 to 1 ratio is revealed just as we encounter it sometimes on advertisements for vehicle tires: Buy 3 tires get 1 free. We also can see this in the 3 colors (Red- Yellow- Green) used in 1 Traffic light. Another example is the holding of 1 pen or pencil with three fingers to write with. Additional examples may be seen here: 3-2-1 ratios a. However, it should be understood this is not an exhaustive compilation. Multiple others exist and may be referenced as a "four" or some other multiplicity that has not been scrutinized in search of a possible alternative arrangement because this idea is not part of a typical teaching or learning curriculum.

    An attempt to explain the recurrence of major patterns-of-three and the 3 -to- 1 ratio by producing a testable hypothesis by way of a very simple idea is presently being rejected by both Evolutionary theorists and Theologians; with the latter being consumed by the conjectures of faith and belief or some model of grandiose metaphysics; and the former being consumed by the minutia of chemistry in terms of chemical Evolution which overlooks the value of the irradiating Sun and Fast spinning Earth, along with the much closer Moon at the time. Intellectually and visually you need to travel back in time when the Earth's Rotation was much faster. This fast rotation under the Sun, in the presence of a much closer Moon, created the condition of a 3-patterned strobe light effect from the Sun's three distinct phases known as Dawn- Noon- Dusk. While those involved with chemical evolution experiment with different ideas about early environments, they have not tried a 3-patterned strobe light effect, or a stationary light source with an accelerated base of experimentation, even though they may use a centrifuge in their laboratory.

    The triple strobe-light effect was coupled to a two-patterned night/day sequencing event. The three phases/moments in 1 Sun constitute a 3 -in- 1 impression not only on early, photo-sensitive biological materials but later on for those groups of people who were oriented to the Sun, and thus were psychically influenced to recall those biologically earlier solar impressions. Hence, I am describing the idea of the Christian Trinity as a metaphor being used to unknowingly describe the influence of the Sun on early human thinking that was not conscious enough to recognize their ideas reflected the impression of the Sun.

    While there was no "brain" as we know it on early biologically "focused" macro-molecules, this is not to say that events of billions of years ago are not "recalled" in terms of the underlying pattern out of which life arose. A simpler analogy is to speak of those who claim to have memories of the womb where the brain is developing. The absence of a brain in early development does not necessarily forego the possibility of recalling a former experience in biological terms. In fact, all of biology is a series of memories about evolutionary development. If cells forgot how to divide, there would not be life as we know it.) For whatever reason(s), some groups have become (re-)awakened to the 3-part impression having occurred billions of years ago on basic biological substrates that influenced the triplet code we see in DNA. While other patterns can be seen or imagined to have existed, they did not create the sequencing of patterns we can not make out as being apparent steps, however crude and amateurish one might think the present illustration is.

    It matters not if biological materials came from outside the Earth, when they landed on the Earth they became successively "branded" into complying with the 3-patterned dictates of the sky god called the Sun. However, this then suggests life on Earth may be dependent on a 3-patterned solar-type of influence for venturing far into space, or the triple patterned genetics of life as we know it will become unraveled. While other patterns are available, they are not that important for sustaining our present kind of biological life. For example, we could be removed from an environment where there exists a pattern-of-seven such as the color spectrum, without suffering death. Not so with the case of duality and triplicity, though we could create dichotomization within a triple design. A doublet code does not provide us with the present currency with which we pay the cost for living in the present environmental circumstances.


    Page Initiated: Saturday, 14th December, 2024... 9:10 AM
    Initial Posting: Tuesday, 17th December, 2024... 2:16 PM