(Realization of a Tripartite Consciousness)
→→→ Tripartite Collection 1 ←←←
| EP 1 | EP 2 | EP 3 | EP 4 | EP 5 | EP 6 |
| EP 7 | EP 8 | EP 9 | EP 10 | EP 11 | EP 12 |
Detectives of the Mind as of Nov. 22, 2024
It is difficult for the human species not to recognize patterns of one kind or another. My lists of threes and twos..., suggests that the human mind does in fact use recurring patterns whether or not the reader thinks there is any overall meaning, message or mystery. Mathematicians find meaning in recurring numbers, and so do physicists, Military strategists, as well as Risk managers, stock brokers, sports analysts, Musicologists, bankers, bookies, bakers, and multiple other professions. While some of these may not look into other subjects and recognize a similar type of patterning is being used to describe respective materials and ideas within a given profession, those that do so may secretly ascribe the view that the human brain has a recurring behavior of engaging in similar patterns as a basic form of underlying architectural scaffolding. Just because the same framework is used to prop-up different facades of language and vocabulary, doesn't mean the framework itself has a different basis of material construct. In other words, if the standard scaffolding in metal upon which a wooden structure, brick structure, stone structure, bone structure, cell structure, fluid/mechanical/electrical structure, etc., are applied, then quibbling about which metal is being used due to the smelting process of the same kind of ore may be little more then egotistically aligned semantics.
It is of interest to note though while humans use multiple binary systems of momentum and structure such as the bipedal gait and the "pendulated" momentum of swinging arms and legs, the balance of such requires the interaction of three semi-circular canals to sustain equilibrium. Let us also imply that the bipedal gait may be a fundamental influence for sustaining "bipedal thinking" called dualities, but the use of a tripod gait for robotic entities may well influence more triadic thinking, thus supporting the view that H.G. Wells in his War of the Worlds story about Martians exhibiting structures in threes, could be seen as prophetic.
- 3 main cell types: Prokaryotic cells- Eukaryotic animal cells- Eukaryotic plant cells.
- Triplet Microtubules: Found in the cytoplasm of cells that help maintain cell shape, move organelles, and separate chromosomes during cell division.
- 3 Types of Microtubules found in centrioles and cilia: Singlet- Doublet- Triplet:
- Singlet Microtubules: A canonical Microtubule with 13 protofilaments.
- Doublet Microtubules: Made up of two tubules, one complete with 13 protofilaments and one incomplete with 10 protofilaments.
- Triplet Microtubules: A cellular organelle called the basal body is made up of nine Microtubule triplet blades.
- 3 main classes of spindle Microtubules: astral, kinetochor, polar (or interpolar).
- 3 Types of Microtubules found in centrioles and cilia: Singlet- Doublet- Triplet:
- 3 domains of life: Bacteria- Archaea- Eukaryotes
- 3 basic forms of Bacteria: Sphere-shaped (cocci), Rod-shaped (bacilli), Spiral-shaped (spirochetes).
- 3rd domain gives rise to 3 Germ layers.
- 3 Germ layers give rise to animals from earth worms to humans. (Endoderm- Ectoderm- Mesoderm)
- 3-part organizations in human anatomy have given rise to multiple -threes ideas:
- 3 most commonly used anatomical divisions: Coronal - Sagittal - Transverse planes
- 3 races idea (African- Asian- Caucasian)... is now disputed and replaced by a model of multiplicity.
- 3 social classes division (Upper- Middle- Lower)... is frequently added on to with sub-divisions.
- 3 distinctive approaches to come to terms with changes (with respect to the I Ching): (Chinese Philosophy of Change (Yijing) [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy])
- The cosmological approach.
- The rational humanistic approach.
- The divination approach.
- 3 Medieval Guild divisions: Master- Journeyman- Apprentice.
- 3 Ages of early Tool/weapon making: Paleolithic- Neolithic- Bronze (for Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. ["Bronze age"; Encyclopædia Britannica, 2013.])
- 3 Cultural stages aligned with ancient tool/weapon making: Stone age– Bronze age– Iron Age.
- 3 Generalized stages of Primate development towards emergence of humanity:
- Post primate Homini (upright walking, small brains).
- Pre Homo Homini (upright walking, larger brains).
- Homo "tribe" (strong, resourceful, inventive, explorative... and then becoming stay-at-home technology dependent couch potatoes).
- 3 named Great Greek Philosophers: Socrates- Plato- Aristotle.
- 3 named Great Chinese Philosophers: Confucius (Confucianism)- Laozi (Daoism)- Hanfeizi (Legalism).
- 3 primary types of energy found in biological systems:
- Chemical energy; stored within chemical bonds.
- Kinetic energy; is the energy of motion.
- Potential energy; is stored due to an object's position or structure.
- 3 main types of energy utilized by cells:
- Chemical energy (stored in molecules like glucose).
- Electrical energy (used for nerve impulses).
- Mechanical energy (used for movement).
- 3 primary sources of energy for cells (3 stages of cellular metabolism):
- Carbohydrates; (fiber, starches, and sugars).
- Fats; (lipids); (3 main types of lipids: triglycerides, phospholipids, and sterols.)
- Proteins; (3 main classes which correlate with typical tertiary structures: globular proteins, fibrous proteins, and membrane proteins.)
- (these molecules are broken down within the cell to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the usable form of energy for cellular processes).
- 3 primary energy carrying molecules for cells:
- Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP).
- Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NADH).
- Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide (FADH2).
- 3 divisions of the brain and related genes:
- Fore-brain, Pox 2/5/8 gene
- Mid-brain, Ox gene
- Mid-brain, Hox gene
- 3 Models of symmetry in the animal world: Assymetrical- Radial- Bilateral.
- 3 Models of Feeding in the animal world: Herbivore- Carnivore- Omnivore.
- 3 Divisions to insects: Head- Thorax- Abdomen.
- 3 body plans: Acoelomate- Coelomate- Pseudocoelomate
- 3 Human male & body types: Ectomorph- Mesomorph- Endomorph.
- 3 body types in the Portrayal of the Buddha: Fat- Medium- Skinny.
If you look at language we can cite the use of a 3-part (linear) Word Order, consisting of a Subject- Object- Verb, but not necessarily in this arrangement. Yet, while there are other patterns-of-three to be culled such as the consonants- vowels- suprasegmentals, we also need to look at the mechanism of Hearing. If the ear were constructed with a different dominant pattern, we might well have a different type of speech/language/vocabulary and thought process.
- 3- tiered cosmos where god is in the 3rd realm: Underworld- Earth- Heaven
- 3 roots and 3 wells connected with the Norse Mythology of the Cosmological Yggdrasil tree.
- 3 roots, 3 wells of ancient Norse cosmology tree called Yggdrasil
- Humanity seeks the 3rd realm by way of 3 great Monotheistic religions having been born in desert environments.
- Christianity (with the idea of a Trinity: Father- Son- Holy spirit/ghost)
- Hinduism (with the idea of a Trimurti: Brahma- Vishnu- Siva)
- Islam (no similar major triadic structure noted, use of older enumerations)
- Christianity references 3 divisions of reality: Heaven- Purgatory- Hell
- Hinduism has the concept of tri-loka, which is a division of the universe into three parts (with seven divisions): Earth (Bhuloka), Heaven (Svarga), and Hell (Naraka).
- Islam has 3 main dimensions: (The goal of Islam is to have the body, heart, and mind perform optimally, and Muslims believe that these three
dimensions lead to that.)
- Islam: Outward submission to the will of Allah.
- Iman: Faith, belief, or trust.
- Ihsan: Perfection or excellence.
- Buddhism has its 3 paths: Mahayana- Theravada- Vajrayana (multiple other tripartitions exist)
- Daoism (Taoism) has 3 basic virtues: Compassion- Frugality- Humility, which are known as the Three Treasures or Three Jewels.
- Humata: Good thoughts, or the intention to follow Asha, the right order of things.
- Hukhata: Good words, or the communication of that intention.
- Havarashta: Good deeds, or the realization of that intention in action.
- Osirian (or Abydos) triad of Osiris (husband), Isis (wife), and Horus (son).
- Theban triad of Amun, Mut and Khonsu.
- Memphite triad of Ptah, Sekhmet and Nefertem.
- Elephantine triad of Khnum (god of the source of the Nile river), Satet (the personification of the floods of the Nile river), and Anuket (the Goddess of the nile river).
- Solar Representation triad: Sun-god Ra, whose form in the morning was Khepri, at noon Re-Horakhty and in the evening Atum.
- Three (large to small) bears... plus Goldilocks
- Three (triplet?) pigs... plus a wolf
- Three Fiddlers... plus Old/Ole' King Cole
- 3 direct line descendent Thoroughbred heirs: Matchem- King herod, Eclipse.
| St. Augustine's Philosophy: | Memory ~ Understanding ~ Will |
| Comte's Philosophy: | Great Being ~ Great Medium ~ Great Fetish |
| Hegel's 3 Spirits: | Subjective Spirit ~ 0bjective Spirit ~ Absolute Spirit |
| Plotinu's Philosophy: | One ~ One Many ~ One and Many |
| Aristotle's 3 Unities: | Unity of Action ~ Unity of Time ~ Unity of Place |
| Sir F. Bacon's 3 Tables: | Presence ~ Absence ~ Degree |
| Thomas Hobbes's 3 Fields: | Physics ~ Moral Philosophy ~ Civil Philosophy |
| Immanuel Kant's 3 Critiques: | Pure Reason ~ Practical Reason ~ Judgment |
| Averroes's 3 Commentaries: | Little ~ Middle ~ Great |
| Karl Marx's 3 isms: | Communism ~ Socialism ~ Capitalism |
| Woodrow Wilson's 3 isms: | Colonialism ~ Racism ~ Anti-Communism |
| Hippocrates's Mind Disorders: | Mania ~ Melancholia ~ Phrenitis |
| Emile Durkeim's 3 Suicides: | Egoistic ~ Altruistic ~ Anomic |
| D. Liesman's 3 Social Characters: | Tradition-directed ~ Inner-directed ~ Other-directed |
| Erich Fromm's 3 Symbols: | The Conventional ~ The Accidental ~ The Universal |
| Pythagoras's "fusion" idea: | Monarchy ~ Oligarchy ~ Democracy (into harmonic whole) |
| M.L. King Jr.'s "Middle Road": | Acquiescence ~ Nonviolence ~ Violence |
| Kierkegaard's 3 Stages: | Aesthetic ~ Ethical ~ Religious |
| Husserl's 3 Reductions: | Phenomenological ~ Eidetic ~ Religious |
| St. Augustine's 3 Laws: | Divine Law ~ Natural Law ~ Temporal, or positive Law |
| Witness Stand "Laws": | Tell the Truth ~ The whole Truth ~ Nothing but the Truth |
| Titus Carus's 3 Ages: | Stone Age ~ Bronze Age ~ Iron Age |
| Feuerbach's 3 Thoughts: | God, 1st Thought ~ Reason, 2nd ~ Man, 3rd |
| Magnus's 3 Universals: | Ante Rem ~ In Rem ~ Post Rem |
| Max Weber's 3 Authorities: | Traditional ~ Charismatic ~ Legal-rational |
| F. de Sausure's 3 "Signs": | Sign ~ Signified ~ Signifier |
| Charles Pierces 3 "Signs": | Qualisign ~ Sinsign (token) ~ Legisign |
| John Keynes's 3 Eras: | Scarcity ~ Abundance ~ Stabilization |
| George Mead's 3 Distinctions: | Self ~ I ~ Me |
| Thrasher's 3-group Gangs: | Inner Circle ~ Rank & File ~ Fringers |
| Abe Lincoln's 3-For-All: | Of the People ~ By the People ~ For the People |
| Jesus Christ's 3 Praises: | In the name of the Father ~ Son ~ Holy Spirit |
| Samuel Clemmons' 3 lies: (Mark Twain) |
Lies ~ Damned Lies ~ Statistics |
|
Thesis ~ Antithesis ~ Synthesis Indulgence ~ "Middle Way" ~ Ascetism Major Premise ~ Minor Premise ~ Conclusion Contradiction ~ Excluded Middle ~ Identity Principal | ||
| "God-ology": Omnipresent Omnipotent Omniscient |
"Metaphysics-ology": What is real How change comes What is mind |
Marxian "Dialectology": Unity of opposites Quantity & quality Negation of negation |
| Epistemology: How we know What is truth What is mind |
Axiology: Nature of good Nature of beautiful Nature of religious |
Ontology: Quality (1st-ness) Relation (2nd-ness) Representation (3rd-ness) |
Source: Threes Listings, column 5
The foregoing is just a handful of examples. There are multiple others: Tripartite World Reality.
And your initial argument is what? That there are other patterns of enumeration to be culled from different subjects? To which I ask if you have actually made an effort to catalogue them to see which ones and how many and to what are the referencing? If you did, you would then also notice there is a Conservation of Number to the extent there are only a very few enumerated patterns being used, thus suggesting we humans and other life forms are being subject to a force adoption of this as a survival mechanism, and that we can identify the culprit effecting the enforcement.
Does not a recurring pattern of human cognitive activity suggest an Intelligent Design or are we looking at Stupidity? Or is it stupidity only because someone off the street (so to speak) identified an easily recognizable pattern that so-called intelligent experts surrounded by Institutions, awards, and multiple Intelligent colleagues have overlooked? What do you call it when hundreds of millions of people have overlooked a recurring pattern that is present in everyday life? Mass Insanity? Mass stupidity? Mass ignorance? and yet believe in stupid two-patterned religious, political, business ideas, as well as traditions of dichotomization?
Because we can see instances of a 1-2-3 maturational development trends, it is not far-fetched to consider that the human psyche may follow suit in some fashion of expression, if only to speak of a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd stage by way of allusion, or descriptively without an accompanying number but expresses a step beyond the conventional. If this is the case, then the widespread uses of dichotomy might well have an awakening notion of a trichotomy that is called Nirvana, Heaven, Valhalla, Happy hunting grounds, Higher consciousness, to be one with god, to be one with the Buddha, ethereal plane of existence, alternative dimension, superiority, Third Reich, Third Rome, Three Worlds, three tasks to be performed (seen in Fairy tales but sometimes practiced outside of them as a real life requirement), etc...
Humanity has and is developing different models of alluding to the internal drive to reach a third type of consciousness but while some get closer, most do not achieve it because not only are environmental conditions not appropriate for the development, but a largely exercised plethora of dichotomization in present day society is a hindrance.
When we can see the development of biology and human cognition developing over time and illustrated by using simple enumeration, we are ultimately confronted by the question of origination. And if we find that the origination is the planetary activity of three elements: Sun- Moon- Earth, we are thus confronting religion once again to rethink its position on what is meant by god and the place of humanity in the larger scope of the Universe, when we note the presence of an articulable pattern of successive development where digressions, reversals, mutations and punctuations can be documented, assigned, and explained.
Using a pattern-of-three as a tool for investigation, dissection, compilation, illustration, experimentation, philosophizing, and creating mathematical-like formulas, can be useful in the hands of someone who has been using the craft for awhile. It does not matter if you view the craft as some sort of crude basket weaving or finger painting or shrunken head collectivity. Practitioners of different crafts can provide insight even if the result is eventually described as being wrong. Dead ends can be useful, just like bad math formulas, wrong chemical mixtures, poor carburetor adjustments, stupid download mistakes on one's phone or computer, drinking and eating too much, etc... Mistakes, wrong turns, running into obstacles, etc., can provide the proverbial wisdom of Hindsight is good Foresight if it leads to Insight. An example of this 3-part idea is here: Hindsight, foresight and insight: three lenses for better policy-making by ANZSOG (Australia and New Zealand School of Government).
Typically, humans begin cataloguing perceptions and identify what they believe to be are patterns... and afterwards may eventually develop a preliminary system of categorization such as the Binomial system... or Bible, or Book of numbers, or Koran, or Instruction/training manual, or textbook, or dictionary, or Encyclopedia, etc., which may enable them to see other patterns... sometimes. But if someone comes up with a newer pattern which more comprehensively incorporates collections of multiple other compilations, including those which are considered sacred or the standard usage, it may well be treated as Darwin's on the Origin of Species book in an environment where various religious zealots existed. Or similarly be received as Galileo Galilei's idea of the Earth not being at the center of the Universe, in the very egotistical atmosphere of an age that viewed one's religion, one's concept of god, one's people, one's country and one's planet as the Center of the Universe. Imagine designing a design that incorporates multiple designs, like an artist or musician or mathematician who compiles multiple art or forms of equations into a single compilation whose coherency may or may not have to be illustrated by a simple follow-the-numbers or trace-the-dots explanation portrayed using step-by-step pictures.
We humans look about the world and create the notion that there is order, disorder and proportions thereof. At one time in the distant past, humans created the idea of multiple gods to explain the presence of perceived experiences such as clouds, weather phenomena, the ocean, etc., and thus claimed the gods were all powerful, all knowing, and existed everywhere, but were not all loving, caring or considerate, because of existing evils. Hence, gods were though to be vengeful, but could be appeased, like a child who could do or say something so as not to be punished. Hence, the gods could be unpredictable. However, later on in history, humanity came to adopt the egotistical idea embraced and practiced by the Jews that there was only god and that they were the chosen people to inhabit a chosen land. Thus, the idea of one god came into vogue, but the same dispositions which were given to multiple gods was now attributed to one god.
However, Albert Einstein of particle physics fame said that God does not play dice with the Universe, yet no one has openly asked why not, with a follow up chorus. Einstein is sometimes treated like the King without clothes on or as a supernatural being... that died. Why can't god do as he, she, it wants? Why can't god do whatever, whenever, wherever? Such as gamble with human lives, if not with all of life? Indeed, why in the world does such a supposed god of the Universe need religion or faith from humans? What is so great about humanity if only its oversized ego and self-importance?
Humans look about the world and discover what they think are patterns and may well claim the supposed patterns seen in Nature (by humans) are not human made, but are made by something superior to humans and that something is intelligent because humans think the perceived patterns represent intelligence based on some presumed repetition. Which begs the question of whether an absence of a repetition can be viewed as an expression of intelligence. In any respect, humans think there is an intelligent design created by an intelligent designer. While this is not an issue with many people, the problem arises when this simple and straight forward idea is compounded by a lot of nonsense called religion and religion tries to not only own the Intelligent Designer but claim what this designer can and can not do and how the designer works. And then such idiocy is compiled into a book and the items within the book are said to be "god's will" to be imposed on everyone according to the dictates of those who claim or are claimed by others as representatives of their god. It's no wonder people turn to Science or mathematics, or reject various teachings.
If a new pattern comes into view it is either claimed to be a revelation to be controlled and owned by some religion, or related to that which is to be rejected, by both Science and Religions because it can only be understood in terms used to react negatively or dismissively... because to embrace it as a possibility requires revisioning of doctrine to comply with a new perspective, thus revealing faults and inconsistencies of both science and religion. Using actual events and objects which have occurred in history does not validate a text that is being used to convey an outdated view. For example, events of actual history recorded in a religious text does not make the whole of the text just as accurate. Being innocent and regarded valuable by association infants and jewelry can be just as silly as being viewed guilty by association with a person who has committed a crime but served out a prison sentence. If this were true then all religious which speak of the devil are just as guilty because to know the devil and evil means a person has been associated with such... directly or indirectly.
Yet, can an intelligent design occur by accident? What about unintended intelligent consequences? Is one more intelligent if they study religion, or some other subject needed to make a living as a mechanic in an automotive industry? Is it more intelligent to know of god and less intelligent to know of the Devil? Is it more intelligent to study flowers or pollinating insects or both more than the weather? Indeed, what is intelligence and therefore intelligent design? Can you recognize intelligent design if you are not intelligent or the word intelligent is not in your vocabulary? Are you more intelligent if you study the world's religions or the world's sciences? Or did some past religious text writer understand the importance of non-religious knowledge and incorporate the view that some god instructed them to include the need for non-religious study in a religious text, whereby later generations allowed for instruction in other subjects, so that future generations would not do away with hypocritical religious nonsense?
So what if humans discover 3 laws of motion and 3 laws of planetary motion and Einstein uses a three-patterned equation to express the mass to energy equivalency formula (E = M times C2)? What does it matter that life exists on the 3rd planet from a source of energy that some humans have referred to as a god? And should it matter that life uses a triplet code in DNA or that there are 3 life domains and that the most Intelligent creature called humans arose by way of the third domain (Eucaryotes) and 3 germ layers? And should it matter to us that human anatomy is replete with patterns -of- three? Is this design or a coincidence? If it is a viable design pattern, then why aren't those advocating for an Intelligent design using it in their argument... if only because it is a pattern seen in evolution as well as the history of religion.
God can play dice with the Universe if god wants to, or use specific types of patterns. God doesn't need religion, humans do. God doesn't even need humans since their are multiple other life forms... if life is at all important, and not the result of some experiment or accident. No less, god can use whatever god wants, such as Evolution, war, chaos, peace, life or death. And yes, god can use music, art, mathematics, physics, etc... God does not need humanity, humanity needs an excuse, a rationale to promote its own views for its own purposes... however good, bad, wrong, right, or otherwise.
Those who preach for the idea of Intelligent Design to be taught in schools to replace the idea of Evolution, are just as silly as those who preach Evolution as a definitive absolute and not as a widely accepted view that might be replaced in the future with a better understanding of life whose views are testable and do not have to rely solely on some metaphysic called belief or faith. Evolution can well be part of an Intelligent Design, just as Intelligent design can be part of Evolution, with or without ridiculous religious beliefs dependent on a world-view of dichotomization. Evolution has multiple looking intelligent designs just as does Physics and Mathematics, music, art and dance. We humans refer to our perceptions and categorizations as Intelligent because we think we are... because of the exclusivity of our ignorance unable to compare it with anything better. In other words, it is easy for some to claim they are intelligent by describing something other than that which a few in leadership positions can influence others to agree upon, as well as describe non-intelligence to suit their interests.
They call it Intelligent Design, but use the designs developed by Science to bolster their claim, mixed with religion when it suits them, and do not produce their own. Where is the Intelligent Design of Intelligent Design, without resorting to the illustrations already established by other subjects? I could say the "threes" phenomena is a design, except the adherents of both Evolution and Intelligent design have no idea what I'm talking about. For both camps claiming Intelligence, and yet the Evolution advocates would call the pattern-of-three a model of Numerology and those in the Intelligent Design camp would resort to some religious explanation of triads, mythology, fairy tales, and the Trinity or Trimurti. One becomes too specialized and the other too generalized. And by doing so, they both remain tunnel visioned. Whereas both use patterns-of-three in their explanations, they do so by standing on a pedestal of duality. And they have no idea what I am talking about... even if I point out their usage of three-patterned exercises as part of their method of illustration.
Page Initiated: Saturday, 14th December, 2024... 9:11 AMInitial Posting: Tuesday, 17th December, 2024... 2:18 PM